親愛的財政司司長,
請容許咱這樣說 ：「互聯網學習是不是等同遙距學習？」
若是, 就請放棄這計劃吧, 互聯網學習是毒, 學者不但不能學到相關課題最基本的知識 (這是政府半官方機構, 香港中医藥管理委員會的偉論), 且讓用者沈迷不醒ｏ
香港中医藥管理委員會這偉論更俱咱們的衛生署及食物衛生局所認可, 在這官方己認定的立場下, 咱建議:
1. 禁罷所有在香港創辨的遙距及兼讀課程
2. 關閉所有相關的院校及機構, 如香港公開大學之流ｏ 它們的成效已被官方否定了ｏ 關了它們附合咱政府既定的政策ｏ
謝謝ｏ
camson tang
財 政 司 司 長 將 協 調 研 究 提 供 互 聯 網 學 習 機 會
2009-10-14 HKT 12:16
施 政 報 告 表 示 ， 為 減 少 數 碼 鴻 溝 造 成 學 習 質素 差 異 ， 財 政 司 司 長 將 會 協 調 有 關 政 策 局 研 究 ， 善 用 民 、 商 、 官 協 作 ， 為 有 需 要 學生 提 供 更 方 便 合 宜 的 互 聯 網 學 習 機 會 。
另 外 ， 政 府 會 通 過 家 庭 議 會 和 青 年 事 務 委 員 會 ， 培 養 青 少 年 身 心 健 康 和 面 對 挑 戰 的 能 力 。
青 年 事 務 委 員 會 和 青 年 組 織 ， 會 開 展 道 德 教 育 ， 並 通 過 文 化 藝 術 、 體 育 康 樂 等 活 動 ， 幫 助 青 少 年 盡 展 潛 能 。 亦 會 增 加 對 青 少 年 制 服 團 體 的 支 援 。
2009年10月14日 星期三
2009年9月29日 星期二
豈有此理 - 周一嶽
To : Mr York Y N Chow, SBS, JP Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Ms Sandra Lee, JP Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Dear Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food Bureau,
It is unreasonable and not appropriate to have only a Unique way for 中醫註冊.
I believe and am always be told that you want to uphold the professional standard of the industry of Chinese medicine.
Thus, please allow the PRC's Licenced (Nation-wide) Chinese Medicine Practitioners, CMP, to help build the Industry. They are the qualified professionals. Please have a little respect on them.
On the other hand, you may be aware that your Rubber Chop, the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong, in her website has encouraged your so called Registered CMPs of Hong Kong to sit for the exam. of PRC's Licenced (Nation-wide) Chinese Medicine Practitioners. Why?
Being a policy designer, please be open and direct in a way that is beneficial to the society and the Industry.
Thank you.
Camson Tang
Ms Sandra Lee, JP Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Dear Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food Bureau,
It is unreasonable and not appropriate to have only a Unique way for 中醫註冊.
I believe and am always be told that you want to uphold the professional standard of the industry of Chinese medicine.
Thus, please allow the PRC's Licenced (Nation-wide) Chinese Medicine Practitioners, CMP, to help build the Industry. They are the qualified professionals. Please have a little respect on them.
On the other hand, you may be aware that your Rubber Chop, the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong, in her website has encouraged your so called Registered CMPs of Hong Kong to sit for the exam. of PRC's Licenced (Nation-wide) Chinese Medicine Practitioners. Why?
Being a policy designer, please be open and direct in a way that is beneficial to the society and the Industry.
Thank you.
Camson Tang
You have a FORTUNE FORTELLING ability - Examination Not trustworthy ?
To : Mr York Y N Chow, SBS, JP Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Ms Sandra Lee, JP Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Dear Sirs,
By now, I really understand that you, Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong, Health Department of Hong Kong and Bureau of Health, Welfare and Food, all saying that Examination Not trustworthy in assessing applicants' mimimum qualification for the entry of the Industry of Chinese Medicine by the Scandal, 考官放水門生過關 醫生專科試集體作弊 十一月初參加由香港家庭醫學學院的專科資格考試.
I am very pleased to learn empirically that You have a FORTUNE FORTELLING ability.
May it be possible for me to be advised of the forthcoming Mark Six numbers?
If so, I might retire.
camson tang
Ms Sandra Lee, JP Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Dear Sirs,
By now, I really understand that you, Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong, Health Department of Hong Kong and Bureau of Health, Welfare and Food, all saying that Examination Not trustworthy in assessing applicants' mimimum qualification for the entry of the Industry of Chinese Medicine by the Scandal, 考官放水門生過關 醫生專科試集體作弊 十一月初參加由香港家庭醫學學院的專科資格考試.
I am very pleased to learn empirically that You have a FORTUNE FORTELLING ability.
May it be possible for me to be advised of the forthcoming Mark Six numbers?
If so, I might retire.
camson tang
will you apologize to family of every dead patient?
What is the point of getting the apology from 陳馮富珍 who are proud of getting the unique experience of the death and those being infected from SARS as her valuable in competing for the CEO of WHO.
By the news report in TV, you also understand that she treasures the above experience as her selling point for the Chief of WHO.
Please be understood the personality of 陳馮富珍. The innocient persons died and those being infected from SARS are not her relatives, friends with whom she has nothing concerned.
camson
By the news report in TV, you also understand that she treasures the above experience as her selling point for the Chief of WHO.
Please be understood the personality of 陳馮富珍. The innocient persons died and those being infected from SARS are not her relatives, friends with whom she has nothing concerned.
camson
陳馮富珍 is the Leader of Health Department of Hong Kong
陳馮富珍 deployed and direct all resources by setting the her policies to combat SARS.
陳馮富珍 should bear all the consequence of her decisions that she made.
Camson Tang
陳馮富珍 should bear all the consequence of her decisions that she made.
Camson Tang
Please stay in WHO. 陳馮富珍：若敗選即回港發展
No matter you elected or not, Please stay in WHO where you get the highly respected jobs. Then why don't you stay there forever.
SARS victims do not want to see you back, I believe. Please be informed there are many talented, outstanding medicial guys in Hong Kong who may contribute in the Health Industry by replacing you in Hong Kong.
Please don't come back.
Camson Tang
SARS victims do not want to see you back, I believe. Please be informed there are many talented, outstanding medicial guys in Hong Kong who may contribute in the Health Industry by replacing you in Hong Kong.
Please don't come back.
Camson Tang
Wrong Policy & Wrong Decision of former Health Department Chief (2006)
陳馮富珍 bieng the former Chief of Health Department must bear the political and /or even the criminal responsibilities for her own Wrong Policy & Wrong Decision on the way of handling the SARS in which many of innocent citizens were killed and infected.
陳馮富珍, herself should be ashamed of being a practitioner / worker in the health industry. She should be refrained from working in the health industry ever since the broke-out of SARS.
What the SARS experience 陳馮富珍 has learned in Hong Kong is just a mess and irresponsible consequences of her wrong decision /policy on SARS.
陳馮富珍 gets promotion by stepping upon the lives and infestion of SARS of our innocent citizens in Hong Kong.
Our mainland Government, please be understood that other than 陳馮富珍 who obviously is not the right person to get your sponsor, there are still many talent and experienced practitioners out there in Hong Kong for you to nominate as the chief of WHO.
Thank you.
Camson Tang
陳馮富珍, herself should be ashamed of being a practitioner / worker in the health industry. She should be refrained from working in the health industry ever since the broke-out of SARS.
What the SARS experience 陳馮富珍 has learned in Hong Kong is just a mess and irresponsible consequences of her wrong decision /policy on SARS.
陳馮富珍 gets promotion by stepping upon the lives and infestion of SARS of our innocent citizens in Hong Kong.
Our mainland Government, please be understood that other than 陳馮富珍 who obviously is not the right person to get your sponsor, there are still many talent and experienced practitioners out there in Hong Kong for you to nominate as the chief of WHO.
Thank you.
Camson Tang
Exactly against the policies of the Government of HKSAR
I reter to The Secretary of Security Bureau that Hong Kong is lessening her requirements and standards in the immigration plan for attracting professionals coming to HK for prospering our domestic society.
It is clear that the Govt of HKSAR wants to recruit talented professionals to upgrade the quality of our population and I believe the other countries including USA, Australia are currently doing the same. But CMCHK, like a frog inside a well, practise exactly against the policies what the Govt of HKSAR and other countries have long to achieve.
I doubt very much that what the merits are for the better development and the future of the industry of chinese medicine in Hong Kong to have CMCHK still here. It's just wasting taxpayers' money.
It seems that CMCHK, without any decision power, only execute pre-set rules, the job of which can be satisfactorily accomplished by some junior, low ranking workers, the pay of them will be much for economical than that of now.
Camson Tang
It is clear that the Govt of HKSAR wants to recruit talented professionals to upgrade the quality of our population and I believe the other countries including USA, Australia are currently doing the same. But CMCHK, like a frog inside a well, practise exactly against the policies what the Govt of HKSAR and other countries have long to achieve.
I doubt very much that what the merits are for the better development and the future of the industry of chinese medicine in Hong Kong to have CMCHK still here. It's just wasting taxpayers' money.
It seems that CMCHK, without any decision power, only execute pre-set rules, the job of which can be satisfactorily accomplished by some junior, low ranking workers, the pay of them will be much for economical than that of now.
Camson Tang
「yes man」 最 受 歡 迎 - Chinese Medicine Council HK (2006)
Dear Mr Jeff Leung, Principal Assistant Secretary for Health
Mr York Y N Chow, SBS, JP
Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Ms Sandra Lee, JP
Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
I refer to the online news from Apple Daily today. I really consider that no matter in commercial areas and/or the semi-governmental organizations, like the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong, CMCHK, the majority members of which appears to be the "Yes-Man" of your Bureau. The rules of game of those members in CMCHK are just like the non-independent executive directors in 海 域 集 團. They do not argue for what is right or not and not rectify what is ought to be corrected in her policy. They just carry out what is being told, without inputing their professional judgement and even sacrificing their own dignity to keep the fake membership titles.
Hi......
Camson Tang
"「 yes man 」 最 受 歡 迎
怎 樣 才 是 一 名 稱 職 的 非 執 行 董 事 呢 ？ 去 年 英 國 研 究 公 司 Whitehead Mann 對 英 國 500 多 個 董 事 會 做 了 一 份 調 查 ， 名 為 「 What makes an exceptional Non-Executive Director? 」 《 金 融 時 報 》 亦 有 報 道 。 該 調 查 報 告 的 結 論 指 出 ， 傑出 的 非 執 行 董 事 ， 其 中 一 項 是 ： 「 They recognise their legal responsibility and have strong principles, acting as the conscience of shareholders 」， 即 他 們 知 道 自 己 有 法 律 責 任 ， 並 有 高 度 的 原 則 作 為 股 東 們 的 良 心 ！
最 有 趣 的 是 ， 該 報 告 指 出 ， 最 差 的 非 執 董 便 是 那 些 「 yes man 」 ， 他 們 只 在 董 事 會上 充 數 ， 不 會 對 任 何 問 題 進 行 爭 論 。 筆 者 感 到 ， 本 港 的 上 市 公 司 主 席 或 大 股 東 ， 查實 不 少 頗 喜 歡 這 類 「 yes man 」 形 的 非 執 董 ， 因 為 他 們 不 會 對 管 理 層 構 成 障 礙 ， 最少 不 會 在 董 事 會 上 「 阻 手 阻 腳 、 搞 寸 個 party 」 。
對 一 些 老 闆 來 說 ， 請 了 一 個 傑 出 的 非 執 董 ， 分 分 鐘 可 能 相 等 於 「 放 一 隻 老 鼠 入 米 缸」 ， 因 為 這 些 非 執 董 肯 定 會 凡 事 問 、 凡 事 查 證 ， 對 管 理 層 構 成 極 大 不 方 便 。 所 以 筆者 猜 想 ， 傑 出 的 非 執 行 董 事 ， 可 能 反 而 沒 有 人 願 意 請 。 正 如 股 壇 長 毛 （ David Webb ） ， 不 少 上 市 公 司 見 到 他 在 股 東 大 會 中 出 現 已 經 怕 怕 ， 還 敢 請 他 做 非 執 董 嗎？
在 美 國 ， 經 常 有 小 股 東 及 投 資 者 對 疏 忽 及 失 職 的 上 市 公 司 董 事 及 非 執 董 等 人 ， 進 行集 體 訴 訟 ， 及 索 取 巨 額 賠 償 ， 所 以 對 上 市 公 司 的 管 理 層 來 講 ， 可 構 成 較 大 的 阻 嚇 力。 可 是 本 港 卻 沒 有 類 似 機 制 ， 一 般 小 股 東 亦 沒 有 如 此 財 力 ， 足 以 聘 請 律 師 們 為 他 們追 討 ， 所 以 馬 局 長 應 該 想 想 辦 法 。
譚 紹 興
Mr York Y N Chow, SBS, JP
Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Ms Sandra Lee, JP
Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
I refer to the online news from Apple Daily today. I really consider that no matter in commercial areas and/or the semi-governmental organizations, like the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong, CMCHK, the majority members of which appears to be the "Yes-Man" of your Bureau. The rules of game of those members in CMCHK are just like the non-independent executive directors in 海 域 集 團. They do not argue for what is right or not and not rectify what is ought to be corrected in her policy. They just carry out what is being told, without inputing their professional judgement and even sacrificing their own dignity to keep the fake membership titles.
Hi......
Camson Tang
"「 yes man 」 最 受 歡 迎
怎 樣 才 是 一 名 稱 職 的 非 執 行 董 事 呢 ？ 去 年 英 國 研 究 公 司 Whitehead Mann 對 英 國 500 多 個 董 事 會 做 了 一 份 調 查 ， 名 為 「 What makes an exceptional Non-Executive Director? 」 《 金 融 時 報 》 亦 有 報 道 。 該 調 查 報 告 的 結 論 指 出 ， 傑出 的 非 執 行 董 事 ， 其 中 一 項 是 ： 「 They recognise their legal responsibility and have strong principles, acting as the conscience of shareholders 」， 即 他 們 知 道 自 己 有 法 律 責 任 ， 並 有 高 度 的 原 則 作 為 股 東 們 的 良 心 ！
最 有 趣 的 是 ， 該 報 告 指 出 ， 最 差 的 非 執 董 便 是 那 些 「 yes man 」 ， 他 們 只 在 董 事 會上 充 數 ， 不 會 對 任 何 問 題 進 行 爭 論 。 筆 者 感 到 ， 本 港 的 上 市 公 司 主 席 或 大 股 東 ， 查實 不 少 頗 喜 歡 這 類 「 yes man 」 形 的 非 執 董 ， 因 為 他 們 不 會 對 管 理 層 構 成 障 礙 ， 最少 不 會 在 董 事 會 上 「 阻 手 阻 腳 、 搞 寸 個 party 」 。
對 一 些 老 闆 來 說 ， 請 了 一 個 傑 出 的 非 執 董 ， 分 分 鐘 可 能 相 等 於 「 放 一 隻 老 鼠 入 米 缸」 ， 因 為 這 些 非 執 董 肯 定 會 凡 事 問 、 凡 事 查 證 ， 對 管 理 層 構 成 極 大 不 方 便 。 所 以 筆者 猜 想 ， 傑 出 的 非 執 行 董 事 ， 可 能 反 而 沒 有 人 願 意 請 。 正 如 股 壇 長 毛 （ David Webb ） ， 不 少 上 市 公 司 見 到 他 在 股 東 大 會 中 出 現 已 經 怕 怕 ， 還 敢 請 他 做 非 執 董 嗎？
在 美 國 ， 經 常 有 小 股 東 及 投 資 者 對 疏 忽 及 失 職 的 上 市 公 司 董 事 及 非 執 董 等 人 ， 進 行集 體 訴 訟 ， 及 索 取 巨 額 賠 償 ， 所 以 對 上 市 公 司 的 管 理 層 來 講 ， 可 構 成 較 大 的 阻 嚇 力。 可 是 本 港 卻 沒 有 類 似 機 制 ， 一 般 小 股 東 亦 沒 有 如 此 財 力 ， 足 以 聘 請 律 師 們 為 他 們追 討 ， 所 以 馬 局 長 應 該 想 想 辦 法 。
譚 紹 興
2009年9月28日 星期一
A letter to Secretary of the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong in 2005
Dear Mrs Ngan (Now Carmen Chan)
Secretary of the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong
Further to our telephone dialogue about two weeks ago, I appreciate very
much for the meaningful conversation. Hearing your advice, I have just got, on 31st January, a Candidate examination booklet in which I find the above subject listed inside the Appendix I, violating the Section 61(1a) of the Chinese Medicine Ordinance, CMO, Chapter 549.
Where DID the CMO, Chinese Medicines Ordinance, have such a qualification requirement : "Part-time or Distance Learning courses will not be accepted" which is stipulated in Paragragh 3 of Appendix I in page 11 of your candidate booklet, for applicants of the subject examination?
The misleading, unreasonable & universally unacceptable requirement : "Part-time or Distance Learning courses will not be accepted" not only violates the Chinese Medicine Ordinance under which your Council is estabished and delegated authority of administration and scruitiny of the chinese medicine profession but also acts against the international academic tertiary rules of practice.
I never heard of the qualification of "Part-time or Distance Learning
courses will not be accepted" as the equivalents of the full time learning qualifications. There are many offshore Univerisities in the world, including Uinted Kingdom, USA, Australia which are offering the Part-time or Distance Learning degree level and post-graduate level courses in Hong Kong.
The Off-campus graduates obtain the same academic standard / qualifications as the full time graduates do, as advocated by many off-shore universities, taking for an example: The University of London offers external degrees of Law and Economics. The graduates under Law discipline are also recognised in Hong Kong and the Law Society of Hong Kong.
As far as I am concerned, for a professional body to assess the academic qualification for a candidate for registration purposes, she ususally asks if the academic degree is recognised in the related profession in the country the qualification obtained. if it is affirmative, then it is recognised as the equivalent standard. This practice is universally carried out when assessing the applicants who registrate as a member of a professional body, taking for an instance, the Hong Kong Institute of Certfified Public Accountants, which is also set up under the Professional Accountants Ordinance.
The same way of practice currently appies to many professional bodies in the world. Then why the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong has acted against the international way of practice.
In addition, talking about the degrees and post-graduate degress of Open University of Hong Kong which is the local University offers degrees in a distance learning mode. Then are the qualifications not recognised in Hong Kong, just like the way your Councl currently practising?
To conclude straight, the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong not only violates the the Chinese Medicine Ordinance and discriminates the off-campus graduates's recognised qualifications but also the way of practice is not up to standard.
I understand that your Council has done great effort to set up the registration procedures but please widen and be open in treating the status of "REAL" equivalents.
Your immediate remedial action is highly appreciated.
Camson Tang
Secretary of the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong
Further to our telephone dialogue about two weeks ago, I appreciate very
much for the meaningful conversation. Hearing your advice, I have just got, on 31st January, a Candidate examination booklet in which I find the above subject listed inside the Appendix I, violating the Section 61(1a) of the Chinese Medicine Ordinance, CMO, Chapter 549.
Where DID the CMO, Chinese Medicines Ordinance, have such a qualification requirement : "Part-time or Distance Learning courses will not be accepted" which is stipulated in Paragragh 3 of Appendix I in page 11 of your candidate booklet, for applicants of the subject examination?
The misleading, unreasonable & universally unacceptable requirement : "Part-time or Distance Learning courses will not be accepted" not only violates the Chinese Medicine Ordinance under which your Council is estabished and delegated authority of administration and scruitiny of the chinese medicine profession but also acts against the international academic tertiary rules of practice.
I never heard of the qualification of "Part-time or Distance Learning
courses will not be accepted" as the equivalents of the full time learning qualifications. There are many offshore Univerisities in the world, including Uinted Kingdom, USA, Australia which are offering the Part-time or Distance Learning degree level and post-graduate level courses in Hong Kong.
The Off-campus graduates obtain the same academic standard / qualifications as the full time graduates do, as advocated by many off-shore universities, taking for an example: The University of London offers external degrees of Law and Economics. The graduates under Law discipline are also recognised in Hong Kong and the Law Society of Hong Kong.
As far as I am concerned, for a professional body to assess the academic qualification for a candidate for registration purposes, she ususally asks if the academic degree is recognised in the related profession in the country the qualification obtained. if it is affirmative, then it is recognised as the equivalent standard. This practice is universally carried out when assessing the applicants who registrate as a member of a professional body, taking for an instance, the Hong Kong Institute of Certfified Public Accountants, which is also set up under the Professional Accountants Ordinance.
The same way of practice currently appies to many professional bodies in the world. Then why the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong has acted against the international way of practice.
In addition, talking about the degrees and post-graduate degress of Open University of Hong Kong which is the local University offers degrees in a distance learning mode. Then are the qualifications not recognised in Hong Kong, just like the way your Councl currently practising?
To conclude straight, the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong not only violates the the Chinese Medicine Ordinance and discriminates the off-campus graduates's recognised qualifications but also the way of practice is not up to standard.
I understand that your Council has done great effort to set up the registration procedures but please widen and be open in treating the status of "REAL" equivalents.
Your immediate remedial action is highly appreciated.
Camson Tang
2009年9月22日 星期二
Why do not consider the current trend of the industry of Chinese Medicine?
To : Mr York Y N Chow, SBS, JP Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Ms Sandra Lee, JP Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Dear Sirs,
The world is changing. China is fostering the development of medical practitioners of Chinese Medicine in order to meet the needs of public for medical insufficiency.
Now, as I have already stated in my previous emails to you that Hong Kong is lacking of medical professionals. Then, why not consider the current trend of the industry of Chinese Medicine in PRC?
Here below are some comments about the captioned subject. Hope that it may be of help in considering the review of registration and supervison of Chinese Medicine in Hong Kong.
camson tang
成報, Nov 8, 07 - 10:42 AM
師徒制習中醫 內地准執業有志懸壺添門徑 港業界歡迎新措施
國家中醫藥管理局宣布放寬在內地執業中醫師的執業程序，容許沒有專業醫學學歷的市民，包括本港、澳門及台灣的市民，透過師承及臨床培訓，考取內地執業中醫師資格。本地中醫學會歡迎有關構思，預料未來會有更多港人透過新機制，在內地成為中醫師。
記者葉志賢報道
在內地要成為執業醫師，不需要一定要在學院修讀醫科課程。國家中醫藥管理局醫政司司長許志仁昨日在北京舉行記者會日時公布新考核措施，他稱，當局容許擁有 高中或以上程度的本地及港澳台人士，跟隨一位從事傳統醫學15年以上經驗的醫師學習，經三年實習期後，再通過考試，便可在指定的省市醫療機構試用一年時 間。
臨床培訓毋須專業學歷
他進一步說，當試用期滿後，學員便可以申請考核成為執業助理醫師，之後，再從事傳統醫學醫療 工作五年時間，再申請參加考試，合格才可成為正式的執業醫師。許志仁補充，「為以師承方式學習傳統醫學，充分發揮中醫的家傳師授傳統，為不具備醫學專業學 歷的人員，提供另一行醫途徑。」
香港註冊中醫學會會長陳抗生歡迎有關構思，他認為港人，必須具備大學中醫學位，方有資格考核成為執業中醫師，以便在港執業。他補充，如一些市民無法在港考取中醫學歷資格，惟亦有心志行醫，可以循此新措施，在內地完成行醫的夢想。
陳抗生又謂，本港有4000多名執業中醫師，但部分中醫生意欠佳，他鼓勵這些中醫師往返內地執業，以發揮醫學所長。
全國研發改進診療水平
另外，中國將在全國100家醫院和研發單位中，開展中醫診療設備調查工作，以提高中醫診斷和治療水平。與此同時，國內亦計劃在9個省開設中醫診所，如河北 省石家莊市、湖南省長沙市及廣東省深圳市，駐診中醫須具有連續5年的臨床工作經驗，並只可在店內處方中藥，不可以出售藥物，否則屬違規。
國家中醫藥管理局宣布放寬在內地執業中醫師的執業程序，容許沒有專業醫學學歷的市民，包括本港、澳門及台灣的市民，透過師承及臨床培訓，考取內地執業中醫師資格。本地中醫學會歡迎有關構思，預料未來會有更多港人透過新機制，在內地成為中醫師。
記者葉志賢報道
在內地要成為執業醫師，不需要一定要在學院修讀醫科課程。國家中醫藥管理局醫政司司長許志仁昨日在北京舉行記者會日時公布新考核措施，他稱，當局容許擁有 高中或以上程度的本地及港澳台人士，跟隨一位從事傳統醫學15年以上經驗的醫師學習，經三年實習期後，再通過考試，便可在指定的省市醫療機構試用一年時 間。
臨床培訓毋須專業學歷
他進一步說，當試用期滿後，學員便可以申請考核成為執業助理醫師，之後，再從事傳統醫學醫療 工作五年時間，再申請參加考試，合格才可成為正式的執業醫師。許志仁補充，「為以師承方式學習傳統醫學，充分發揮中醫的家傳師授傳統，為不具備醫學專業學 歷的人員，提供另一行醫途徑。」
香港註冊中醫學會會長陳抗生歡迎有關構思，他認為港人，必須具備大學中醫學位，方有資格考核成為執業中醫師，以便在港執業。他補充，如一些市民無法在港考取中醫學歷資格，惟亦有心志行醫，可以循此新措施，在內地完成行醫的夢想。
陳抗生又謂，本港有4000多名執業中醫師，但部分中醫生意欠佳，他鼓勵這些中醫師往返內地執業，以發揮醫學所長。
全國研發改進診療水平
另外，中國將在全國100家醫院和研發單位中，開展中醫診療設備調查工作，以提高中醫診斷和治療水平。與此同時，國內亦計劃在9個省開設中醫診所，如河北 省石家莊市、湖南省長沙市及廣東省深圳市，駐診中醫須具有連續5年的臨床工作經驗，並只可在店內處方中藥，不可以出售藥物，否則屬違規。
文匯報, Nov 8th, 2007 - 10:45 AM
家傳師授獲承認 通過考核可在內地行醫國家中醫局放寬港人考牌
【本報北京新聞中心記者劉凝哲7日電】衛生部及國家中醫藥管理局提出，放寬考核成為執業中醫師的程序，容許沒有專業醫學學歷的人士，透過師承及臨床培訓， 考取內地執業中醫師資格；其中，香港人亦可返回內地師承傳統醫學，獲得醫師資格後，可在內地行醫。本港中醫師公會相信，放寬考核程序，會吸引更多人到內地 學中醫及執業。 國家中醫藥管理局今日宣布，中國將改革中醫師的准入制度，將民族醫藥界傳統「家傳師授」教學模式納入認證體系，傳統醫學師承和確有專長人 員可在通過考核後可獲得行醫資格。
中醫師制度大改革
國家中醫藥管理局醫政司司長許志仁表示，日前新出台《傳統醫學出師考核和確有專長考核實施方案》及《考核大綱》，對中醫藥界傳統的教學模式參加醫師資格考試做了明確規定。
許志仁表示，傳統醫學師承人員必須具高中以上學歷，帶教老師則必須具有中醫、民族醫學執業資格並從事中醫、民族醫臨床工作15年以上或具有中醫、民族醫學專業副主任醫師以上專業技術職務資格。師承人員與帶教老師需簽訂師承關係合同，並經公正方可生效。
毋須考核西醫內容
許志仁稱，在師承人員跟師學習滿3年後，可申請參加出師考試。出師考試將由當地政府命題，並綜合所學專長繼承情況等，原則上不考西醫內容。出師考核合格後，師承人員在醫療機構中試用期滿一年並經考核後，即可參加執業助理醫師資格考試。
衛生部醫政司副司長張宗久稱，中醫師准入制度可適用於港人。港人可返回內地跟師學習中醫藥，經上述程序後，即可獲得行醫執照。至於兩地互認中醫師資格的事情，目前尚正在討論中。
張宗久還表示，越來越多的港人返回內地學中醫藥並取得醫師資格，相信出台的新辦法將吸引更多港人關注中醫藥事業，兩地同心支持中醫藥事業的發展。
【本報北京新聞中心記者劉凝哲7日電】衛生部及國家中醫藥管理局提出，放寬考核成為執業中醫師的程序，容許沒有專業醫學學歷的人士，透過師承及臨床培訓， 考取內地執業中醫師資格；其中，香港人亦可返回內地師承傳統醫學，獲得醫師資格後，可在內地行醫。本港中醫師公會相信，放寬考核程序，會吸引更多人到內地 學中醫及執業。 國家中醫藥管理局今日宣布，中國將改革中醫師的准入制度，將民族醫藥界傳統「家傳師授」教學模式納入認證體系，傳統醫學師承和確有專長人 員可在通過考核後可獲得行醫資格。
中醫師制度大改革
國家中醫藥管理局醫政司司長許志仁表示，日前新出台《傳統醫學出師考核和確有專長考核實施方案》及《考核大綱》，對中醫藥界傳統的教學模式參加醫師資格考試做了明確規定。
許志仁表示，傳統醫學師承人員必須具高中以上學歷，帶教老師則必須具有中醫、民族醫學執業資格並從事中醫、民族醫臨床工作15年以上或具有中醫、民族醫學專業副主任醫師以上專業技術職務資格。師承人員與帶教老師需簽訂師承關係合同，並經公正方可生效。
毋須考核西醫內容
許志仁稱，在師承人員跟師學習滿3年後，可申請參加出師考試。出師考試將由當地政府命題，並綜合所學專長繼承情況等，原則上不考西醫內容。出師考核合格後，師承人員在醫療機構中試用期滿一年並經考核後，即可參加執業助理醫師資格考試。
衛生部醫政司副司長張宗久稱，中醫師准入制度可適用於港人。港人可返回內地跟師學習中醫藥，經上述程序後，即可獲得行醫執照。至於兩地互認中醫師資格的事情，目前尚正在討論中。
張宗久還表示，越來越多的港人返回內地學中醫藥並取得醫師資格，相信出台的新辦法將吸引更多港人關注中醫藥事業，兩地同心支持中醫藥事業的發展。
南華早報 Josephine Ma in Beijing
Pilot scheme boosts traditional medicine
Beijing is stepping up measures to regulate practitioners of Chinese medicine as part of efforts to promote traditional remedies and meet the mainland's vast need for health care.
Chen Zhu , recently appointed health minister, is an advocate of traditional medicine and is expected to make it one of his policy priorities, according to a Ministry of Health source.
The ministry yesterday announced a pilot scheme under which herbal clinics would be opened within pharmacies in 10 cities, districts and counties.
The trial will include setting standards for herbalists and requirements for their clinics in pharmacies, as well as stepping up supervision of practitioners.
The clinics would start operating in the first quarter of next year and progress would be reviewed in April, Xu Zhiren, chief of the medical administration department at the State Administration of Chinese Medicines, said yesterday.
The clinics would be restricted to offering herbs to avoid the promotion of fake or substandard drugs, he said. They would be required to stock more than 400 kinds of herbs, and their practitioners should have at least five consecutive years of clinical experience.
The central government is also moving to regulate the training of practitioners of Chinese medicine, who have traditionally passed on their skills through apprenticeships rather than formal courses.
Experienced practitioners who meet the requirements for mentorship will be required to sign a contract with their apprentices, who will have to pass professional examinations before they can become certified medical practitioners.
Mr Xu said it was difficult to estimate the number of practitioners who learned their skills through apprenticeships. The new requirement also caps the number of apprentices each mentor can train at two.
He said the regulations were also applicable to Hong Kong and Macau residents under the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement.
From what we see now, Hong Kong and Macau students are more active in participating in the [professional] examinations [for herbal medicine practitioners], Mr Xu said.
In recent years, we have had several hundreds students [from Hong Kong and Macau] sitting in the professional examination, and the passing rates in the past have been very good.
Beijing is stepping up measures to regulate practitioners of Chinese medicine as part of efforts to promote traditional remedies and meet the mainland's vast need for health care.
Chen Zhu , recently appointed health minister, is an advocate of traditional medicine and is expected to make it one of his policy priorities, according to a Ministry of Health source.
The ministry yesterday announced a pilot scheme under which herbal clinics would be opened within pharmacies in 10 cities, districts and counties.
The trial will include setting standards for herbalists and requirements for their clinics in pharmacies, as well as stepping up supervision of practitioners.
The clinics would start operating in the first quarter of next year and progress would be reviewed in April, Xu Zhiren, chief of the medical administration department at the State Administration of Chinese Medicines, said yesterday.
The clinics would be restricted to offering herbs to avoid the promotion of fake or substandard drugs, he said. They would be required to stock more than 400 kinds of herbs, and their practitioners should have at least five consecutive years of clinical experience.
The central government is also moving to regulate the training of practitioners of Chinese medicine, who have traditionally passed on their skills through apprenticeships rather than formal courses.
Experienced practitioners who meet the requirements for mentorship will be required to sign a contract with their apprentices, who will have to pass professional examinations before they can become certified medical practitioners.
Mr Xu said it was difficult to estimate the number of practitioners who learned their skills through apprenticeships. The new requirement also caps the number of apprentices each mentor can train at two.
He said the regulations were also applicable to Hong Kong and Macau residents under the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement.
From what we see now, Hong Kong and Macau students are more active in participating in the [professional] examinations [for herbal medicine practitioners], Mr Xu said.
In recent years, we have had several hundreds students [from Hong Kong and Macau] sitting in the professional examination, and the passing rates in the past have been very good.
東方日報 Nov 8th, 2007 - 10:47 AM
內地新例允師承式學中醫
【本報訊】國家生部與國家中醫藥管理局推出 考核執業中醫師的新規定，在讀大學之外另闢途徑成為中醫。擁有高中以上程度學歷者，跟隨一名有十五年以上經驗的資深中醫學師三年，再通過指定考核便可成為 執業中醫師。國家中醫藥管理局及本港中醫組織均認為，可吸引有志學中醫的港人到內地學習中醫。不過，循此途徑考取內地中醫師資格的港人，返港後不能行醫， 因為本港中醫藥管理委員會規定必須修讀不少於五年的全時間制中醫本科學位課程者，才能參加註冊中醫執照試，合格才能行醫。
根據內地新規定，高中或以上程度的內地和港澳台人士要成為執業中醫師，可找一名有十五年行醫經驗的執業中醫師，雙方簽訂師承關係合同，學師三年後，通過省級中醫藥管理部門的考核，再到醫療機構實習一年，試用期合格後參加執業助理醫師資格試。
料更多港人內地拜師
國家中醫藥管理局醫政司司長許志仁認為，現時由大學培訓中醫的做法範圍太窄，師承家傳的新政策出台後，料有更多港人到內地透過師承學習中醫，學中醫人數也較現時多。
香港中醫師公會會長關之義認為，內地當局為中醫培訓制訂清晰機制，令對中醫有興趣港人可透過師徒制成為中醫師。
【本報訊】國家生部與國家中醫藥管理局推出 考核執業中醫師的新規定，在讀大學之外另闢途徑成為中醫。擁有高中以上程度學歷者，跟隨一名有十五年以上經驗的資深中醫學師三年，再通過指定考核便可成為 執業中醫師。國家中醫藥管理局及本港中醫組織均認為，可吸引有志學中醫的港人到內地學習中醫。不過，循此途徑考取內地中醫師資格的港人，返港後不能行醫， 因為本港中醫藥管理委員會規定必須修讀不少於五年的全時間制中醫本科學位課程者，才能參加註冊中醫執照試，合格才能行醫。
根據內地新規定，高中或以上程度的內地和港澳台人士要成為執業中醫師，可找一名有十五年行醫經驗的執業中醫師，雙方簽訂師承關係合同，學師三年後，通過省級中醫藥管理部門的考核，再到醫療機構實習一年，試用期合格後參加執業助理醫師資格試。
料更多港人內地拜師
國家中醫藥管理局醫政司司長許志仁認為，現時由大學培訓中醫的做法範圍太窄，師承家傳的新政策出台後，料有更多港人到內地透過師承學習中醫，學中醫人數也較現時多。
香港中醫師公會會長關之義認為，內地當局為中醫培訓制訂清晰機制，令對中醫有興趣港人可透過師徒制成為中醫師。
Referral of IT guys
Dear Mr. Tam, the Legislative Councilor,
I want to enquire the possibility of referral of IT guys who want to enhance the the presentation of Income Statement of Accounting software, as compiled with the Hong Kong Accounting Standards, HKFRS 1 (Revised), effective on 1/1/2009, as the current ready available Accounting software could not provide this flexibility on revised presentation of Income Statement.
Please comment.
Camson Tang
I want to enquire the possibility of referral of IT guys who want to enhance the the presentation of Income Statement of Accounting software, as compiled with the Hong Kong Accounting Standards, HKFRS 1 (Revised), effective on 1/1/2009, as the current ready available Accounting software could not provide this flexibility on revised presentation of Income Statement.
Please comment.
Camson Tang
PLEASE FACILITATE the Mutual Recognition of CMPs (PRC & HK)
To : Mr York Y N Chow, SBS, JP Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
I write to request your kind consideration of the captioned subject.
Please be understood that it is the Government of HKSAR who requests, initiated by relevant professional bodies concerned, for mutual recognition of professioal qualifications with Mainland through CEPA under which I hope ,you may recall, that Architects of PRC and Hong Kong have already enjoyed the mutual recognition of thier professioal qualification and the other professions, like Lawyers, Chinese Medicine Practitioners, Dentists as well as Accountants, are in the way of discussion.
Relating to Chinese Medicine Practitioners, the parties involved in discussion, I believe they will be the Health, Welfare and Food Bureau, Department of Health HK and Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong with their PRC counterpart of Ministry of Health.
Please implement the Mutual Recognition of CMPs (PRC&HK) - CEPA
Thank you.
Ms Sandra Lee, JP Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Dear Sirs,Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
I write to request your kind consideration of the captioned subject.
Please be understood that it is the Government of HKSAR who requests, initiated by relevant professional bodies concerned, for mutual recognition of professioal qualifications with Mainland through CEPA under which I hope ,you may recall, that Architects of PRC and Hong Kong have already enjoyed the mutual recognition of thier professioal qualification and the other professions, like Lawyers, Chinese Medicine Practitioners, Dentists as well as Accountants, are in the way of discussion.
Relating to Chinese Medicine Practitioners, the parties involved in discussion, I believe they will be the Health, Welfare and Food Bureau, Department of Health HK and Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong with their PRC counterpart of Ministry of Health.
Please implement the Mutual Recognition of CMPs (PRC&HK) - CEPA
Thank you.
Camson Tang
2009年9月21日 星期一
Augmentation of Chinese Medicine Ordinance
To : Mr York Y N Chow, SBS, JP Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Ms Sandra Lee, JP Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Dear Sirs,
I write to request your kind consideration of the captioned subject.
As the regulation of Industry chinese medicines starts for a few
years, in order to better develop and make it more prosperous, may
I here recommend a way to attract more experienced and qualified
professional(s) from the Peolpe Republic of China to Hong Kong so
as to help improve the image and strengthen the reputation.
No one can deny that the industry starts from ancient China where
has accumulated thousand years of experiences and I also understand
that there are a a lot of academics recruited from China to deliver
lectures and carry out researches in the following universities:
Hong Kong Baptist University, Chinese University of Hong Kong and
University of Hong Kong. In addition, I also learn that graduates
from these Universities are sent ot the Mainland, China to get
their apprentice practising. Therefore, the QUALITY of Licensed
Chinese Medicine Pracititioners, CMP, of China is CONSTRUCTIVELY
affirmed and approved as equivalent as that of Hong Kong by
Profession / Industry and or Education in Hong Kong.
My suggestion simply asks your Council to allow the practising of
the REAL experienced and qualified professional(s) of the Licensed
CMP in Hong Kong by augmenting the Chapter 549, the Chinese
Medicine Ordinance as follows:
1. Section:67 Registration
A person is qualified to apply to be registered as a registered
Chinese medicine practitioner under section 69 if-
a) he has passed the Licensing Examination; or
b) the Practitioners Board has determined that he is so qualified under section 92.
"Proposed to augment:
c) The person has the Practising License of Chinese Medicine
Nation-wide) issued by Ministry of Health, Pepole Republic of
China."
2. Section: 92 Heading: Alternative qualifying requirements
1) The Practitioners Board may determine a person to be qualified
to be registered under section 69 if it is satisfied, after
assessment, that the person-
a) is one whose name is entered on the list maintained under section 90; and
b) has acquired substantial experience, knowledge and skills in
the practice of Chinese medicine.
2) No person shall be regarded as having acquired substantial
experience, knowledge and skills for the purpose of subsection
1)(b) unless he has-
a) attained the standard which qualifies him to be exempted from
the Licensing Examination under section 93;
b) passed the registration assessment as required under section 94; or
c) passed the Licensing Examination as required under section 95.
"Proposed to augment:
c) The person has the Practising License of Chinese Medicine (Nation-wide) issued by Ministry of Health, Pepole Republic of China."
3. S 95: Requirement to undertake Licensing Examination
1) A listed Chinese medicine practitioner who-
a) satisfies the Practitioners Board that immediately before 3
January 2000, he has been practising Chinese medicine in Hong Kong "or Pepole Republic of China" (propose to augment) for a continuous period of less than 10 years; or
(b) has failed the registration assessment,
shall be required to undertake the Licensing Examination, the
passing of which shall qualify him to apply to be registered as a
registered Chinese medicine practitioner under section 69.
2) Notwithstanding subsection (1)(b), a listed Chinese medicine
practitioner who has made a request for review under section 96
shall not be required to undertake the Licensing Examination
pending the outcome of the review.
As Hong Kong is a open society where attract qualified
professionals to help prosper the society. This perspective is
always advocated by the Government of HKSAR, implemented by the
Immigration Department through the Scheme of Attracting Professionals.
We are no afraid of competition that drives to perfect the industry / the entity concerned but we are really afraid of allowing the person who does not qualify to practise that undermine the reputation of the Industry in Hong Kong and this is what the REGULATION means.
Thank you.
Camson Tang
A Proposal of setting up a e-course for group disucssion
I was asked to write something about the captioned subject, which is as follows:
The course will be about the recognition of Distance Learning Education in Hong Kong as a semi-governmental organization does not honour the degrees of Distance Learning Education and Part-time Learning. Threads will be put up for asking students the quality of Distance Learning Education against that of full-time. What are their views and the ways to rectify the discriminating situation.
Whole group discussion will be employed for the course as views from students may be exchanged among the whole group. Each of them may state/share his/her perceptions about the quality of Distance Learning Education.
First of all, a welcome message is directed to the whole group for students' participation of the subject forum.
Being the Emoderator, I shall encourage students' partcipation by stating current situation that their degrees will not be recognised, (e.g. the Chinese Medicine degree offered jointly by Xiamen University / Open University of Hong Kong are not recognised by the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong). Students being a party of prospective part-time degree holders, will certainly discussand debate actively about the issue as it affects their recognised academic status and even the earning power in their employments after graduation in Hong Kong.
During the one or two weeks, students views may be counter-querried by emoderator in a positive impact and also in a negative impact on the quality of of Distance Learning Education.
Then, views from students are consolidated and summarised and certain arguable points, if any, suggested by students, will be put up for further discussion among them.
Then, a round-up is done for first part of discussion about the recognition f Distance Learning Education in Hong Kong.
Here comes the second part - the ways to rectify the discriminating situation
Thread(s) should be set-up which should link from the consolidated views from students of first part and lead students to think about what should be done in defensing their qualification..
Then, views are collected and round up.
A thank you message should be post for students’ participation for the discussion.
That ends.
Camson Tang
The course will be about the recognition of Distance Learning Education in Hong Kong as a semi-governmental organization does not honour the degrees of Distance Learning Education and Part-time Learning. Threads will be put up for asking students the quality of Distance Learning Education against that of full-time. What are their views and the ways to rectify the discriminating situation.
Whole group discussion will be employed for the course as views from students may be exchanged among the whole group. Each of them may state/share his/her perceptions about the quality of Distance Learning Education.
First of all, a welcome message is directed to the whole group for students' participation of the subject forum.
Being the Emoderator, I shall encourage students' partcipation by stating current situation that their degrees will not be recognised, (e.g. the Chinese Medicine degree offered jointly by Xiamen University / Open University of Hong Kong are not recognised by the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong). Students being a party of prospective part-time degree holders, will certainly discussand debate actively about the issue as it affects their recognised academic status and even the earning power in their employments after graduation in Hong Kong.
During the one or two weeks, students views may be counter-querried by emoderator in a positive impact and also in a negative impact on the quality of of Distance Learning Education.
Then, views from students are consolidated and summarised and certain arguable points, if any, suggested by students, will be put up for further discussion among them.
Then, a round-up is done for first part of discussion about the recognition f Distance Learning Education in Hong Kong.
Here comes the second part - the ways to rectify the discriminating situation
Thread(s) should be set-up which should link from the consolidated views from students of first part and lead students to think about what should be done in defensing their qualification..
Then, views are collected and round up.
A thank you message should be post for students’ participation for the discussion.
That ends.
Camson Tang
2009年9月18日 星期五
2009年9月17日 星期四
楊佳 (二)
在理性上, 殺人者死, 是天公地道的, 但咱在思考那个原因, 為何楊佳會干這事, 是條不歸路, 試想一想, 在今天繁華世界裡, 生活條件那麽好, 誰願意去死ｏ 當事件曝光後, 很多各地方的民眾都在為其喊怨, 這應不應該在判死罪前, 充份考慮其作案動機及時實的全部, 才量刑, 就好像剛判刑(無罪釋放)不久的, 一民女在拒被一高官强姦時, 將那官給殺了一樣ｏ
還有一點, 用和平的方式去抗議, 是對的, 是理性的, 但當權的, 不搭理你, 所受的怨屈, 未能解決, 又沒有別人能幫上忙, 時下只有兩條路: (一) 當孫子, 或 (二) 採用較激進的方法去討回公道, 後者, 當然是一个不被認可的方式, 但有沒有別的出路呢？
還有一點, 用和平的方式去抗議, 是對的, 是理性的, 但當權的, 不搭理你, 所受的怨屈, 未能解決, 又沒有別人能幫上忙, 時下只有兩條路: (一) 當孫子, 或 (二) 採用較激進的方法去討回公道, 後者, 當然是一个不被認可的方式, 但有沒有別的出路呢？
2009年9月16日 星期三
楊佳
楊佳是應該被從寬處理的ｏ
一個普通的老百姓為何要這麼的衝動，這麼的憤努地在一个上海的公安局殺傷了七個警察呢？這就不是自尋死路嗎？
他人告訴﹕「現在的公安真不是人，滿口臟話 ，欺壓老百姓......」
上海那一幕只不過是冰山一角吧ｏ你看現在不是有很多地方的公安被當地的老百姓衝擊嗎？這就是民怨四起ｏ這樣再繼續下去，跟在四五十年代被推反的國民黨有何分別ｏ可以這樣說, 楊佳跟往前的公產黨是一樣的,是好樣的ｏ楊佳是在受欺壓, 投訴無門, 他跟誰說理去ｏ沒有一個官願管, 楊佳,你的革命, 你是好樣的ｏ
我認為現在的公產黨忘了他們是為人民服務的，他們是革命軍人及他們鐵一般的三項紀律及八項注意了ｏ
回想華國鋒所倡的兩個「凡是」是有一定的道理：
（一）自打尊義代表大會後 ，傅古,李德,周恩來三人領導小組失敗後,毛澤東再被選為最高領導而創立新中國,這不是對嗎？
（二）毛澤東的堅持製造原子彈,這不是對嗎？
窮唄,怕啥ｏ總比現在富有的活得開心ｏ
公產黨是不是要走國民黨的老路呢？
一個普通的老百姓為何要這麼的衝動，這麼的憤努地在一个上海的公安局殺傷了七個警察呢？這就不是自尋死路嗎？
他人告訴﹕「現在的公安真不是人，滿口臟話 ，欺壓老百姓......」
上海那一幕只不過是冰山一角吧ｏ你看現在不是有很多地方的公安被當地的老百姓衝擊嗎？這就是民怨四起ｏ這樣再繼續下去，跟在四五十年代被推反的國民黨有何分別ｏ可以這樣說, 楊佳跟往前的公產黨是一樣的,是好樣的ｏ楊佳是在受欺壓, 投訴無門, 他跟誰說理去ｏ沒有一個官願管, 楊佳,你的革命, 你是好樣的ｏ
我認為現在的公產黨忘了他們是為人民服務的，他們是革命軍人及他們鐵一般的三項紀律及八項注意了ｏ
回想華國鋒所倡的兩個「凡是」是有一定的道理：
（一）自打尊義代表大會後 ，傅古,李德,周恩來三人領導小組失敗後,毛澤東再被選為最高領導而創立新中國,這不是對嗎？
（二）毛澤東的堅持製造原子彈,這不是對嗎？
窮唄,怕啥ｏ總比現在富有的活得開心ｏ
公產黨是不是要走國民黨的老路呢？
Past letter to Chief Executive of HKSAR (legal aid)
Dear Chief Executive of HKSAR,
I refer to the issue raised by Dr. Hon. Priscilla Leung Mei-fun during your Policy Speech in Legislative Council, about the "Insufficient Legal Assistance for those whose comprehensive assets exceed about HK$160,000".
Unfortunately, at the time Dr. Leung's question was not directly addressed.
Thanks for Priscilla's concern and her action in bring up such an important matter to the attention of the Chief Executive of HKSAR.
I am one of the those citizens whose comprehensive assets exceed the threshold of the Legal Aid Department and thus, I am not eligible to apply legal aid.
On understanding that I cannot bear the court fee in case of failure in litigation, I dare not launch the legal Judicial Review against the decison of your semi-governmental body, the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong despite how unfair and unreasonable of that decision it is.
May I suggest that Mr. Chief Executive, if you win:
do not recourse back all the court fee against the claimants
In doing so, the grievances in the society would be much lower and a more harmonious society will be more highly likely to appear.
Hope that you may consider.
Thank you.
camson tang
I refer to the issue raised by Dr. Hon. Priscilla Leung Mei-fun during your Policy Speech in Legislative Council, about the "Insufficient Legal Assistance for those whose comprehensive assets exceed about HK$160,000".
Unfortunately, at the time Dr. Leung's question was not directly addressed.
Thanks for Priscilla's concern and her action in bring up such an important matter to the attention of the Chief Executive of HKSAR.
I am one of the those citizens whose comprehensive assets exceed the threshold of the Legal Aid Department and thus, I am not eligible to apply legal aid.
On understanding that I cannot bear the court fee in case of failure in litigation, I dare not launch the legal Judicial Review against the decison of your semi-governmental body, the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong despite how unfair and unreasonable of that decision it is.
May I suggest that Mr. Chief Executive, if you win:
do not recourse back all the court fee against the claimants
In doing so, the grievances in the society would be much lower and a more harmonious society will be more highly likely to appear.
Hope that you may consider.
Thank you.
camson tang
2009年9月14日 星期一
「 闯关东」是非常危險的
說實話, 「 闯关东」是非常危險的, 走水路, 從山東出發, 歷程須兩至三月, 途中,有可能碰上清兵的截查, 搶掠, 甚至因拒查而遭炮轟, 另一方面, 海盜又經常殺人掠貨, 船客往往被仍進海中, 無辜的被淹死; 罕路也並非好走, 須半年至九个月才行, 途中有土匪, 惡霸, 也有因水土不服而病死的, 也有因路程太長而餓死的, 都不乏人在, 能成功到關外的, 只餘少數, 為活着, 再兇險, 也得闯ｏ
2009年9月13日 星期日
2009年9月10日 星期四
東北野菜
常見的有二種, 「婆婆丁」與「貓耳朶」ｏ
在老家時, 咱就愛跟咱媳婦一起往後山挖野菜, 最初, 是認不出來的, 時間久了, 就手到拿來, 但始終不及咱媳婦的熟練技巧ｏ
「婆婆丁」挺貴的, 味帶甘, 現在是給種植的, 較野生的大多了, 超過拾塊錢人民幣一斤ｏ聽說, 有一个婆婆, 她長滿了丁瘡, 窮呀, 沒錢買糧, 她只好在山溝裡挖些野菜充饑, 真奇怪, 過了些日子, 她的丁瘡沒了, 鄰居就驚奇的問: 「妳吃了啥藥來消滅了妳的丁瘡？」婆婆說了, 窮得快要飯去了, 那有錢去抓藥, 只是吃了些野菜而已ｏ自打以後, 這野菜就被稱為「婆婆丁」了ｏ
「貓耳朶」, 現在吃它的人不多, 但咱們家的小雞就非常愛吃, 不到一會兒, 一斤多的「貓耳朶」就給滅了ｏ
在老家時, 咱就愛跟咱媳婦一起往後山挖野菜, 最初, 是認不出來的, 時間久了, 就手到拿來, 但始終不及咱媳婦的熟練技巧ｏ
「婆婆丁」挺貴的, 味帶甘, 現在是給種植的, 較野生的大多了, 超過拾塊錢人民幣一斤ｏ聽說, 有一个婆婆, 她長滿了丁瘡, 窮呀, 沒錢買糧, 她只好在山溝裡挖些野菜充饑, 真奇怪, 過了些日子, 她的丁瘡沒了, 鄰居就驚奇的問: 「妳吃了啥藥來消滅了妳的丁瘡？」婆婆說了, 窮得快要飯去了, 那有錢去抓藥, 只是吃了些野菜而已ｏ自打以後, 這野菜就被稱為「婆婆丁」了ｏ
「貓耳朶」, 現在吃它的人不多, 但咱們家的小雞就非常愛吃, 不到一會兒, 一斤多的「貓耳朶」就給滅了ｏ
2009年9月9日 星期三
咱們家的數頭狗 (九)
咱的姨生女今年暑假是在老家渡過的ｏ 回憶起有一趣事, 她的老舅摘了些野生的中藥, 「天天」回家, 熟時全黑,帶甜味, 有滋補的功效ｏ咱的姨生女咀饞, 非常愛吃那「天天」, 咋辨！她並不知道它長在那裡, 她琢磨着, 可以要求「點點」幫忙, 因為「點點」愛亂跑, 舍地方都去過ｏ她就拿了些剩餘的「天天」給「點點」看看, 示意給她尋找, 「點點」是非常聰明的, 不到一刻鍾, 「點點」找到了, 正吠着了, 咱的姨生女就往那裡跑, 說時遲,那時快, 一串的「天天」就往咀裡塞, 挺好吃的樣子, 「點點」都看在眼裡了, 他自个也是一个咀饞的東西, 他挑了綠色的, 一進口, 他就吐, 原來未熟(綠色) 的「天天」是味帶苦的, 咱們聽了,笑不合籠ｏ咱的姨生女也有點良心, 就將所摘下來的和「點點」一起分享ｏ
2009年9月8日 星期二
Through the AIA, you may easily get membership of HKICPA
You may choose AIA which is a bit easier than that of ACCA
The Ranking of AIA and ACCA in UK is 5th and 4th respectively.
Association of International Accountants (AIA) that seems to be a biteasier to qualify as a professional accountant. Through the AIA, youmay get membership of HKICPA by
a. passing ONLY ONE MODULE OF Module B (Financial Management) &
Currently, candidates of accounting graduates have to attend 4 modules workshps and pass the 4 module exams.
b. final examination of the QP &
c. passed the Institute's aptitude tests &
d. pass the workshops of Modules A, C & D only.
It seems that it's a bit beneficial for current members of AIA to qualify in HKICPA.
Below is for your information only.
Body: Association of International Accountants (AIA)
Recognition: Mutual Examination Paper Exemptions
Status as of 19 May 2008: MEPE agreement signed
Deadline for membership application: Nil
New agreement for mutual examination paper exemption (MEPE) takes effect from 1 June 2008 to 31 May 2013.
AIA members applying for the Hong Kong Institute of CPAs membership must meet the following criteria:
1. You hold an accounting or non-accounting degree accredited or recognised by the Institute;
2. You have passed the 16-paper AIA Qualifying Examination in Hong Kong or the U.K.;
3. You have completed and passed the workshops of Module A (FinancialReporting), Module B (Financial Management), Module C (Auditing andInformation Management) and Module D (Taxation) of the Institute'sQualification Programme (QP)*;
4. You have passed the module examination of Module B (Financial Management) of the QP*;
5. You have passed the final examination of the QP*;
6. You have passed the Institute's aptitude tests on Hong Kong law and Hong Kong taxation; ...
I am here just to analyse the facts :
1. through AIA, candidates may exempt 3 modules examinations (published in Aplus) passing rates around 50% - 65% of the four modules.
2. the passing rate of module workshop is disclosed to be around 95% and or more. In that sense, a candidate who is willing (actively) to take part in discussion in workshop, is very difficult to get failed.
By September 2010, assessment (marking for candidates) in workshops would be removed, meaning that each candidates are only requried to attend the workshops only. The assessments would entirely fall on the module examinations and the final examination only.
Does it beneficial to candidates, through AIA, to pass the QP in terms of minimisation of workload and pressure in preparing the module exams.
If candidates consider that attempt the 4 module workshps and sit for the 4 module exams are OK to themselves and/or even better than through the channel of AIA, their perceptions are respected.
Roads are open and freely chosen by those who are interested in.
The Ranking of AIA and ACCA in UK is 5th and 4th respectively.
Association of International Accountants (AIA) that seems to be a biteasier to qualify as a professional accountant. Through the AIA, youmay get membership of HKICPA by
a. passing ONLY ONE MODULE OF Module B (Financial Management) &
Currently, candidates of accounting graduates have to attend 4 modules workshps and pass the 4 module exams.
b. final examination of the QP &
c. passed the Institute's aptitude tests &
d. pass the workshops of Modules A, C & D only.
It seems that it's a bit beneficial for current members of AIA to qualify in HKICPA.
Below is for your information only.
Body: Association of International Accountants (AIA)
Recognition: Mutual Examination Paper Exemptions
Status as of 19 May 2008: MEPE agreement signed
Deadline for membership application: Nil
New agreement for mutual examination paper exemption (MEPE) takes effect from 1 June 2008 to 31 May 2013.
AIA members applying for the Hong Kong Institute of CPAs membership must meet the following criteria:
1. You hold an accounting or non-accounting degree accredited or recognised by the Institute;
2. You have passed the 16-paper AIA Qualifying Examination in Hong Kong or the U.K.;
3. You have completed and passed the workshops of Module A (FinancialReporting), Module B (Financial Management), Module C (Auditing andInformation Management) and Module D (Taxation) of the Institute'sQualification Programme (QP)*;
4. You have passed the module examination of Module B (Financial Management) of the QP*;
5. You have passed the final examination of the QP*;
6. You have passed the Institute's aptitude tests on Hong Kong law and Hong Kong taxation; ...
I am here just to analyse the facts :
1. through AIA, candidates may exempt 3 modules examinations (published in Aplus) passing rates around 50% - 65% of the four modules.
2. the passing rate of module workshop is disclosed to be around 95% and or more. In that sense, a candidate who is willing (actively) to take part in discussion in workshop, is very difficult to get failed.
By September 2010, assessment (marking for candidates) in workshops would be removed, meaning that each candidates are only requried to attend the workshops only. The assessments would entirely fall on the module examinations and the final examination only.
Does it beneficial to candidates, through AIA, to pass the QP in terms of minimisation of workload and pressure in preparing the module exams.
If candidates consider that attempt the 4 module workshps and sit for the 4 module exams are OK to themselves and/or even better than through the channel of AIA, their perceptions are respected.
Roads are open and freely chosen by those who are interested in.
2009年9月7日 星期一
心目中特首和政策官員合適的人選
特首及政策官員可以是任何人, 最理想的, 就是制定政策時, 在老百姓的角度出發, 必須認知老百姓在是官員們的真正的主人, 聽老百姓的, 謙虛的, 他們存在的維一任務, 就是為老百姓謀福而行使附於官員的權力, 為老百姓辨事, 而不是, 以權壓百姓ｏ
不聽市民的, 跟咱們打哈哈的, 自己為尊的, 都不適合當官
咱是十分讚成徹換特首的, 由此, 可全換掉所有的政策官員是好事。
不聽市民的, 跟咱們打哈哈的, 自己為尊的, 都不適合當官。
「泛泛民共識10萬提名可成特首候選人
民主派 代表中午舉行會議，討論香港未來政制改革的方案及爭取2012年雙普選 的行動。泛民在會上達成共識，指特首提名委員會應增加民選區議員，而只要獲得10萬名選民提名，也可成為特首候選人。
發 言人李鵬飛 在會後表示，會上並無討論「總辭」方案。而與會代表就日後普選行政長官 及立法會 的辦法達成共識，建議行政長官提名委員會，除現有800人規模，亦應包括400名民選區議員。而任何候選人，若取得50個委員提名，或取得10萬名選民提 名，即符合資格競選，並希望盡早或於2012年實行。」
不聽市民的, 跟咱們打哈哈的, 自己為尊的, 都不適合當官。
「泛泛民共識10萬提名可成特首候選人
民主派 代表中午舉行會議，討論香港未來政制改革的方案及爭取2012年雙普選 的行動。泛民在會上達成共識，指特首提名委員會應增加民選區議員，而只要獲得10萬名選民提名，也可成為特首候選人。
發 言人李鵬飛 在會後表示，會上並無討論「總辭」方案。而與會代表就日後普選行政長官 及立法會 的辦法達成共識，建議行政長官提名委員會，除現有800人規模，亦應包括400名民選區議員。而任何候選人，若取得50個委員提名，或取得10萬名選民提 名，即符合資格競選，並希望盡早或於2012年實行。」
2009年9月6日 星期日
咱們家的數頭狗 (八)
「小歡」是一头雄性的大狗, 打小就被咱小弟買回來, 當時他的身價是一百塊人民幣ｏ 賜名「小歡」就是希望這头新狗會為咱們家帶進一些歡樂, 因為當時「頓頓」 剛去世ｏ
「小歡」一步進庭園裡, 「花瑪」就衝上去, 查看一下「小歡」的性別, 發現他是公狗後, 就跑回自个的地盆倘着ｏ 「小歡」打小就不懂規舉, 經常在房間大小二便, 這令咱們非常不滿, 最上火的, 就是「花瑪」, 一看見「小歡」有不適當的行為, 二話不說, 就給他教訓, 回想有一次, 「小歡」由於反抗, 差點被咬死, 從那時開始, 為避免皮肉之苦, 「小歡」選擇了舉手投降的策略, 真沒出息, 大狗那能這樣, , 但他非常聰明, 他了解自个的處境, 所以打小就纏在老爺腳旁, 永不離開半步...
「小點」打小就跟「小歡」一齊長大, 累了,「小點」經常睡在「小歡」的肚上, 這點, 咱們養狗這麽多年也不明白, 也是头次看見的ｏ幸好, 「小歡」的不規舉沒有傳給「小點」但他的舉手投降就教給了「小點」ｏ
「小歡」一步進庭園裡, 「花瑪」就衝上去, 查看一下「小歡」的性別, 發現他是公狗後, 就跑回自个的地盆倘着ｏ 「小歡」打小就不懂規舉, 經常在房間大小二便, 這令咱們非常不滿, 最上火的, 就是「花瑪」, 一看見「小歡」有不適當的行為, 二話不說, 就給他教訓, 回想有一次, 「小歡」由於反抗, 差點被咬死, 從那時開始, 為避免皮肉之苦, 「小歡」選擇了舉手投降的策略, 真沒出息, 大狗那能這樣, , 但他非常聰明, 他了解自个的處境, 所以打小就纏在老爺腳旁, 永不離開半步...
「小點」打小就跟「小歡」一齊長大, 累了,「小點」經常睡在「小歡」的肚上, 這點, 咱們養狗這麽多年也不明白, 也是头次看見的ｏ幸好, 「小歡」的不規舉沒有傳給「小點」但他的舉手投降就教給了「小點」ｏ
2009年9月4日 星期五
咱們家的數頭狗 (七)
「點點」咱們家的小狗, 他是給咱小弟在水溝裡檢回來的, 由於他个體很小, 就一點, 所以咸他「點點」ｏ 「點點」是一頭公狗, 救他的時侯, 就只有些微的氣息, 幸虧他命大, 靜靜地倘在熱坑头上一周多, 才活命過來ｏ
「點點」就喜歡胡亂躍跑, 要逮他, 沒有那麽容易, 但他一被抓, 他會像「小歡」一樣, 倘在地上, 舉手投降ｏ
「點點」就喜歡胡亂躍跑, 要逮他, 沒有那麽容易, 但他一被抓, 他會像「小歡」一樣, 倘在地上, 舉手投降ｏ
證監會法規執行部執行董事施衞民
咱就不明白, 假若證監會法規執行部執行董事施衞民真的如蘋果日報所說:
「施衞民徹查雷曼事件立場強硬，懷疑他因為掌握銀行的「罪證」而受壓不獲續約，因此去信財政司司長曾俊華要求交代事件，認為施應留任至雷曼事件完結,作風強硬堅持查銀行。」
他應該是个難得的好官, 人才呀, 維護投資者利益, 調查銀行違規行為, 龔固香港的金融制度, 應該給他提干, 而不是趕他走。
香港現政府就是是非不分, 瞎領導, 自以為是, 極度主觀, 這樣干下去, 就毀了香港的前途。
「施衞民徹查雷曼事件立場強硬，懷疑他因為掌握銀行的「罪證」而受壓不獲續約，因此去信財政司司長曾俊華要求交代事件，認為施應留任至雷曼事件完結,作風強硬堅持查銀行。」
他應該是个難得的好官, 人才呀, 維護投資者利益, 調查銀行違規行為, 龔固香港的金融制度, 應該給他提干, 而不是趕他走。
香港現政府就是是非不分, 瞎領導, 自以為是, 極度主觀, 這樣干下去, 就毀了香港的前途。
全中國中醫執業資格不認, 公共醫院中醫執業經驗不看
根據《中醫藥條例》（香港法例第549章）的規定，任何人士必須參加及通過中醫執業資格試，才具備資格申請成為註冊中醫。除了已獲中醫組通知須參加執業資 格試的表列中醫外，申請人必須已圓滿地完成中醫組認可的中醫執業訓練本科學位課程或中醫組認可與該課程相當的課程，才有資格參加中醫執業資格試。
中醫組說了, 在他們眼裡, 壓根就沒有他們所指的中醫組認可與該課程相當的課程。
什麼條例, 全中國中醫執業資格不認, 公共醫院中醫執業經驗不看, 這對中醫發展有好處嗎？
曾蔭權不理, 什麼特首呀;
周一嶽不管, 什麼局長呀;
前食物及缳生局副秘書長, 聶德權還說: 全世界的中醫發展都跟看着他了。 他現在還升官了, 這是什麼的一个公務員升遷制度！
時任的食物及缳生局副秘書長, 麥駱雪玲女士更不理采市民的电話申訴, 副秘書長, 十多萬一月的高薪公務員(官員)呀。
香港就讓以上的「天才」所領導着, 真可悲。
camson tang
中醫組說了, 在他們眼裡, 壓根就沒有他們所指的中醫組認可與該課程相當的課程。
什麼條例, 全中國中醫執業資格不認, 公共醫院中醫執業經驗不看, 這對中醫發展有好處嗎？
曾蔭權不理, 什麼特首呀;
周一嶽不管, 什麼局長呀;
前食物及缳生局副秘書長, 聶德權還說: 全世界的中醫發展都跟看着他了。 他現在還升官了, 這是什麼的一个公務員升遷制度！
時任的食物及缳生局副秘書長, 麥駱雪玲女士更不理采市民的电話申訴, 副秘書長, 十多萬一月的高薪公務員(官員)呀。
香港就讓以上的「天才」所領導着, 真可悲。
camson tang
2009年9月2日 星期三
人民幣零售債券 (滙豐)
投資與否, 應看風險與回報ｏ
風險:
1. 是不是保本的？
2. 滙豐銀行會不會在兩年期內關張？
3. 如關張, 人民幣零售債券是否含於香港存款保障計劃內？
4. 存最少一百張一百圓的人民幣到稀少的滙豐分行煩不煩, 或會不會蝕差價, 如在滙豐購買人民幣？
5. 在滙豐開立人民幣帳户有沒有附帶條件？
6. 期滿了, 能否一次取回全部的本加息或須數次才行？
7 如本加息留在滙豐, 它的利率優勝嗎？
8. 有沒有在期內流動現金的壓力？
回報
1. 票面年息率係2.6%, 實際利率應較高些 (季派息高於半年一次,更高於一年一次)
2. 比較別的同年期的存款產品, 看誰高一些
3. 你對未來利率走勢的看法
再評估風險與回報, 看誰重誰輕, 才作決定ｏ
以上的只供參考ｏ
風險:
1. 是不是保本的？
2. 滙豐銀行會不會在兩年期內關張？
3. 如關張, 人民幣零售債券是否含於香港存款保障計劃內？
4. 存最少一百張一百圓的人民幣到稀少的滙豐分行煩不煩, 或會不會蝕差價, 如在滙豐購買人民幣？
5. 在滙豐開立人民幣帳户有沒有附帶條件？
6. 期滿了, 能否一次取回全部的本加息或須數次才行？
7 如本加息留在滙豐, 它的利率優勝嗎？
8. 有沒有在期內流動現金的壓力？
回報
1. 票面年息率係2.6%, 實際利率應較高些 (季派息高於半年一次,更高於一年一次)
2. 比較別的同年期的存款產品, 看誰高一些
3. 你對未來利率走勢的看法
再評估風險與回報, 看誰重誰輕, 才作決定ｏ
以上的只供參考ｏ
香港政府發債一千億元
咱們要嚴格執行毛主席的兩个「凡是」
原話 : 「凡是毛主席作出的決策，我們都堅決維護；凡是毛主席的指示，我們都始終不渝地遵循。」
引用在這裡 - 凡是香港政府提出的, 咱們都堅決反對, 凡是香港政府不願意干的, 咱們都堅決維護ｏ
所以咱堅決不買它的債券, 把錢留在口袋裡, 寧不收利息ｏ
原話 : 「凡是毛主席作出的決策，我們都堅決維護；凡是毛主席的指示，我們都始終不渝地遵循。」
引用在這裡 - 凡是香港政府提出的, 咱們都堅決反對, 凡是香港政府不願意干的, 咱們都堅決維護ｏ
所以咱堅決不買它的債券, 把錢留在口袋裡, 寧不收利息ｏ
2009年8月30日 星期日
2009年8月19日 星期三
咱們家的數頭狗 (六)
咱們家的第二頭狗就是母狗大維, 為何一頭母狗會有一个雄性的名字呢? 它的名稱來源是這樣的ｏ大維小的時候, 它總是對人不理采, 怎樣喊它也是徒勞, 一副莫不經心的樣子, 你喊你的, 它干它的, 真叫人生氣ｏ回憶有一次, 电視呼出了一聲大維, 就在這同一時間, 它立即作出反應, 好像它被喊着似的, 從那時開始, 咱們就稱乎它, 大維ｏ
大維非常俊, 長着黃色的長毛, 十分柔順, 它是狗們的雌領班, 狗們對它十分尊重, 而且更是馬首是瞻, 沒有別的挑戰它的地位ｏ
大維善長抓耗子, 一斤重名多的老鼠, 就讓它輕易地手到拿來, 每一次, 它都帶回獵物, 在我們跟前耀武揚威, 聽候獎賞ｏ它的言行就這樣深深地刻在狗們的腦袋裡ｏ
大維非常俊, 長着黃色的長毛, 十分柔順, 它是狗們的雌領班, 狗們對它十分尊重, 而且更是馬首是瞻, 沒有別的挑戰它的地位ｏ
大維善長抓耗子, 一斤重名多的老鼠, 就讓它輕易地手到拿來, 每一次, 它都帶回獵物, 在我們跟前耀武揚威, 聽候獎賞ｏ它的言行就這樣深深地刻在狗們的腦袋裡ｏ
2009年8月18日 星期二
勁片推介 - 軍歌嘹亮
不要光看它的名稱, 它不是一部歌唱片, 它介紹了一个忠誠軍人一生的故事, 挺有趣味 ｏ 話又說回來, 軍歌, 我認為非常好聽, 且它的詞也有意思, 如共產黨的三大紀律, 八項注意就被編成軍歌, 以提高軍隊的素質, 還有那抗美援朝的...等等, 挺激情, 我就愛聽ｏ
致李幼斌
親愛的李幼斌,
自打看了亮剑 的李云龙, 軍歌嘹亮 的高大山 及歷史的天空 的姜大牙, 我就喜歡了看國內电視劇, 喜歡了一九四九年前的八路, 共產黨,
它的三大紀律, 八項注意, 全都强優於時年的國民黨, 日本鬼子, 得民心者得天下, 這就定下了八路, 共產黨勝利所根ｏ
本人看了很多閣下的片, 如 僑省長與他的女兒們, 红日, 仁者无敌, 闯关东, 继父, 红色追击令, 第五个空弹壳, 大江东去, 警察世家, 非常代价, 天怒...等等, 除了亮剑, 我看了接近三十回, 之外 別的就沒有翻看ｏ
我認為相互襯配的劇本, 配樂, 主題歌, 和對白, 最重要ｏ在亮剑就可找到以上成功的素質ｏ在亮剑, 它的配樂多麽緊奏, 它的對白多麽精景, 它的主題歌多麽雄壯,激倩, 它的故事人物多麽衝動, 缺策多麽直率但成功, 這跟傳統智慧, 深思熟慮, 衡量得失的思為有了強烈所對比ｏ我想這劇能這麽成功, 就反映了老百姓對故事人物性格的認同ｏ
到現在為止, 還未有別的劇有這樣好的襯配ｏ
親愛的李幼斌, 選澤應從總體來看, 不應否定了戰爭類同的角色ｏ你是不是要為人民服務, 那就再演 '亮剑' 吧, 我期待着, 等待着ｏ
謝謝ｏ
自打看了亮剑 的李云龙, 軍歌嘹亮 的高大山 及歷史的天空 的姜大牙, 我就喜歡了看國內电視劇, 喜歡了一九四九年前的八路, 共產黨,
它的三大紀律, 八項注意, 全都强優於時年的國民黨, 日本鬼子, 得民心者得天下, 這就定下了八路, 共產黨勝利所根ｏ
本人看了很多閣下的片, 如 僑省長與他的女兒們, 红日, 仁者无敌, 闯关东, 继父, 红色追击令, 第五个空弹壳, 大江东去, 警察世家, 非常代价, 天怒...等等, 除了亮剑, 我看了接近三十回, 之外 別的就沒有翻看ｏ
我認為相互襯配的劇本, 配樂, 主題歌, 和對白, 最重要ｏ在亮剑就可找到以上成功的素質ｏ在亮剑, 它的配樂多麽緊奏, 它的對白多麽精景, 它的主題歌多麽雄壯,激倩, 它的故事人物多麽衝動, 缺策多麽直率但成功, 這跟傳統智慧, 深思熟慮, 衡量得失的思為有了強烈所對比ｏ我想這劇能這麽成功, 就反映了老百姓對故事人物性格的認同ｏ
到現在為止, 還未有別的劇有這樣好的襯配ｏ
親愛的李幼斌, 選澤應從總體來看, 不應否定了戰爭類同的角色ｏ你是不是要為人民服務, 那就再演 '亮剑' 吧, 我期待着, 等待着ｏ
謝謝ｏ
2009年8月17日 星期一
咱們家的數頭狗 (五)
咱們家的狗依泰安為首, 它非常忠心, 也非常勇猛靈活, 一个躍跑, 就可跨過二米多高的圍攔, 沒有什麽可以阻止它ｏ它一旦跑溜, 麻煩挺大的, 泰安對陌生人有攻擊性, 一出手, 就會把人脖子咬破, 誰也管不了, 在無可奈何地泰安就被關在它的私人房間裡, 失去了點自由, 這也是為它好, 也是為了這個家, 以我所觀察, 泰安是明白它自个被關禁閉的原因ｏ理據如下:
一. 泰安從不因被關禁閉而上火
二. 泰安對主人非常和順, 忠誠
全家的外防責任, 就落在它一个身上, 我們就可以睡大覺了ｏ
一. 泰安從不因被關禁閉而上火
二. 泰安對主人非常和順, 忠誠
全家的外防責任, 就落在它一个身上, 我們就可以睡大覺了ｏ
2009年8月14日 星期五
咱們家的數頭狗 (四)
咱們家是位於中國東北的農村, 鄰近火車站, 穿過它, 就是市中心的所在, 我的小弟就經常上街裡溜溜ｏ由於火車班次甚為稀疏 , 咱們家就顯得特別寧靜ｏ我最喜歡在大冷天回去, 在家裡, 特別舒服, 就像跟現代社會隔離似的, 所有煩心的事都跑了, 沒有任何壓力,就仿處世外桃園ｏ
跟小弟不一樣, 我不願意到人太多的地方, 白天我會呆在家裡, 忙忙這个, 幫幫那个; 晚上,我總喜歡跟我太太往屋外的庭園走走, 每次我們都抬頭望星, 那裏一點污雲也沒有, 星星就像指尺之隔, 舉手就可把它摘下來似的ｏ說實話, 我不是一个浪漫的人, 看星只是湊和凑和而已ｏ
跟小弟不一樣, 我不願意到人太多的地方, 白天我會呆在家裡, 忙忙這个, 幫幫那个; 晚上,我總喜歡跟我太太往屋外的庭園走走, 每次我們都抬頭望星, 那裏一點污雲也沒有, 星星就像指尺之隔, 舉手就可把它摘下來似的ｏ說實話, 我不是一个浪漫的人, 看星只是湊和凑和而已ｏ
咱們家的數頭狗 (三)
從大門閘到主屋就拾多米的路, 在我的太太 ,小弟, 大姊, 老爹衆人的保護下, 我走了五分鍾多, 一進房, 我立即躍上坑上,除了上洗手間,就不下來, 心在想, 狗們, 你們能對我怎麽着ｏ 狗們則在屋外繼續吠着...
回想起來, 真有點丟人, 我是個爺們, 怕它們干嗎 ! 狗們就是執行它們的任務吧, 是對的ｏ
回想起來, 真有點丟人, 我是個爺們, 怕它們干嗎 ! 狗們就是執行它們的任務吧, 是對的ｏ
咱們家的數頭狗 (ニ)
步進庭園, 真是一步一驚心, 六頭狗纏着你, 樸上你, 那力度是相當重的, 且它們的口張得老大的, 露出了鋒利且長長的牙齒, 真叫人望而生畏ｃ在另一旁的倉庫裏 (泰安的私人房間), 只看見它併命地, 想衝出鐵枝的窗欄地,憤怒地叫喊着,好像在警告, 不要再往前走, 否則就不客氣了ｏ
2009年8月13日 星期四
咱們家的數頭狗 (一)
最初 咱們家有七頭狗, 它們分別是泰安,大維(母狗）,花瑪, 頓頓,旺旺, 利利, 與儍蛋ｏ 它們全都是大狗, 回億約在二零零零年四月, 當我到了家時, 我真是怕了, 所有的狗都向我吠着, 幸好,那最勇敢,最善戰的泰安被栓住, 要不然,我的小命就沒了ｏ泰安最善長的就是進攻, 連主人也欄不住ｏ別的狗,看了泰安攻擊, 它們就立即加入戰團, 在那個時便, 我跟狗們都是頭次見面ｏ
2009年8月12日 星期三
Women on bus
This morning, I went to work by bus on which I noticed that there were two women who were doing their "exterior decoration". One was creaming her hands while the other was padding the powder on her face. To be honest, these should be the nice events to those whom the two women were going to meet. My eye sight started creeping down gradually from head to legs.
One thing that I find interesting is that women / girls in Hong Kong seem not to wear socks. It seems to me that wearing socks may help keep foots from sweat or cover the majority of imperfection.
Within my eye sight, I could only see one of them who was sitting a bit in front of mine. From my personal view (not representing all men's perceptions), apart from taking care of her hands and face, she did not seem to care about the skin texture of her back, upper arms and legs, the imperfection on which may greatly discount the beautiful face and soften hands.
What do you think ?
One thing that I find interesting is that women / girls in Hong Kong seem not to wear socks. It seems to me that wearing socks may help keep foots from sweat or cover the majority of imperfection.
Within my eye sight, I could only see one of them who was sitting a bit in front of mine. From my personal view (not representing all men's perceptions), apart from taking care of her hands and face, she did not seem to care about the skin texture of her back, upper arms and legs, the imperfection on which may greatly discount the beautiful face and soften hands.
What do you think ?
2009年8月3日 星期一
Children's spending habit with Octopus Card
I recently has come across an event that parents should pay attention to and I want to share with you.
Months ago, I with my neice who was about ten years old, went out for shopping. At that time, I paid for the stuff by credit card and Octopus Card and I did not have any idea of presenting an inappropriate perception to the little girl then.
After a week, the girl's mother discovered that her daughter who originally was always hungry for eating especially during dinna, refused to attend the dinna table. After enquiry, her mother was told that she was not hungry. Her mother was curious as the child was not given much of pocket money. Where is the source of finance ? The mother was puzzled.
Not until the time did her daughter inform her that the Octopus Card needed further re-charge just only a day or two after the last time money-added in the Card. Then, the truth surfaced.
My neice said that her uncle (myself) bought without paying cash but just presenting the cards to the suppliers and she also had one of them, the Octopus Card. She followed suit. At that time, she believed that this was the greatest discovery for making perchase without paying a cent. In that case, she did not need to ask her mother for money to buy the stuff she desired.
Upon understanding the event, I feel that adult should have a responsibility to explain our behaviours or our acts no matter we believe how normal they are, to children, who are indeed like a plain paper that conducts the actions of copy and paste of their senior's behaviours.
We do have a significant influence to our younsters. Please take care !
Months ago, I with my neice who was about ten years old, went out for shopping. At that time, I paid for the stuff by credit card and Octopus Card and I did not have any idea of presenting an inappropriate perception to the little girl then.
After a week, the girl's mother discovered that her daughter who originally was always hungry for eating especially during dinna, refused to attend the dinna table. After enquiry, her mother was told that she was not hungry. Her mother was curious as the child was not given much of pocket money. Where is the source of finance ? The mother was puzzled.
Not until the time did her daughter inform her that the Octopus Card needed further re-charge just only a day or two after the last time money-added in the Card. Then, the truth surfaced.
My neice said that her uncle (myself) bought without paying cash but just presenting the cards to the suppliers and she also had one of them, the Octopus Card. She followed suit. At that time, she believed that this was the greatest discovery for making perchase without paying a cent. In that case, she did not need to ask her mother for money to buy the stuff she desired.
Upon understanding the event, I feel that adult should have a responsibility to explain our behaviours or our acts no matter we believe how normal they are, to children, who are indeed like a plain paper that conducts the actions of copy and paste of their senior's behaviours.
We do have a significant influence to our younsters. Please take care !
2009年7月23日 星期四
SFC, HKMA and 16 banks reach agreement on Minibonds
Dear Chief Executive of HKSAR,
I believe that the reimbursement of 60% and/ or more to investors from the captioned act is a good deed no matter some academics saying that the subject banks are not punished.
The justifications are as follows:
1. The repayment of fund
From the time when Lehman Brothers collapsed up to the present moment, the most ultimate controversial point is the request of repayment of fund. The investigations currently in process in Legislative Council as well as the demonstrations and other violent actions done by investors are the means to facilitate the repayment of fund. By other words, who commits legligence, either, HKMA, SFC or the Distributing Banks, should bear the costs of refund. This is straightly obvious.
2. Suspension of majority of past legal proceedings
From the suspension of past legal proceedings launched originally at Small Claim Tribunal which then has them transferred to District Court, investors seem not to be financially sound enough to further proceed the legal proceedings against the responsible bank(s).
3. Concrete evidence against Banks' legligence
It is difficult to present concrete evidence as investors are not the persons who on purpose set up traps to take advantage of their banks.
4. Banks suffer less due to the up-growing the global stock markets
The Government of HKSAR should ensure efficient reimbursement to investors as soon as possible. On the other hand, banks are advised to lock-in the current position by entering some hedges as no one knows how the market would go. If it were unfortunately to drop dramaticially when the liquidation proceeding finished, the banks might suffer at a maximum of 60% - 2/3 % commission earned for selling the Lehman Brothers instruments.
Peronally, I do not agree with some academics of saying of adopting the measures adopted by Singapore. In doing so, the parties inv0lved would become the victims with a great suffer.
Rectification should have an objective to minimise the losses that Hong Kong has suffered. The current one, though not a perfect one, is an acceptable approach in that sense.
Thanks.
I believe that the reimbursement of 60% and/ or more to investors from the captioned act is a good deed no matter some academics saying that the subject banks are not punished.
The justifications are as follows:
1. The repayment of fund
From the time when Lehman Brothers collapsed up to the present moment, the most ultimate controversial point is the request of repayment of fund. The investigations currently in process in Legislative Council as well as the demonstrations and other violent actions done by investors are the means to facilitate the repayment of fund. By other words, who commits legligence, either, HKMA, SFC or the Distributing Banks, should bear the costs of refund. This is straightly obvious.
2. Suspension of majority of past legal proceedings
From the suspension of past legal proceedings launched originally at Small Claim Tribunal which then has them transferred to District Court, investors seem not to be financially sound enough to further proceed the legal proceedings against the responsible bank(s).
3. Concrete evidence against Banks' legligence
It is difficult to present concrete evidence as investors are not the persons who on purpose set up traps to take advantage of their banks.
4. Banks suffer less due to the up-growing the global stock markets
The Government of HKSAR should ensure efficient reimbursement to investors as soon as possible. On the other hand, banks are advised to lock-in the current position by entering some hedges as no one knows how the market would go. If it were unfortunately to drop dramaticially when the liquidation proceeding finished, the banks might suffer at a maximum of 60% - 2/3 % commission earned for selling the Lehman Brothers instruments.
Peronally, I do not agree with some academics of saying of adopting the measures adopted by Singapore. In doing so, the parties inv0lved would become the victims with a great suffer.
Rectification should have an objective to minimise the losses that Hong Kong has suffered. The current one, though not a perfect one, is an acceptable approach in that sense.
Thanks.
2009年7月16日 星期四
中醫註冊 - Why dont' you take the same approach of Hong Kong Observatory ?
To : Mr York Y N Chow, SBS, JP Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Ms Sandra Lee, JP Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Dear Sirs,
Why dont' you practise like that of Hong Kong Observatory which self considers that her policy(ies) is/are not comprehensive in taking all factors into consideration before launhcing of grade of Typhoon.
Please revisit the unique entrance requirement, a full time degree only, for registering Chinese Medicine Practitioners in Hong Kong. is it comprehensive enough to attract appropriate qualified relevant professionals to help build the industry in Hong Kong?
Please consider the likelihood of inlcuding the PRC Practising Licencse, part-time relevant degree and /or verifiable relevant practising experience.
| 天 文 台 將 採 新 準 則 釐 定 發 三 號 及 八 號 信 號 | |
| 2007-02-26 HKT 12:20 | |
|
Holders of Part-time Degree, STAND UP and fight for yourselves.
Dear all Holders of Part-time Degree,
Holders of Part-time Degree, STAND UP and fight for yourselves.I feel very angry for the discrimination policy against Part-time Degrees set by Chinese Medicines Council of Hong Kong, under the administration of Mr York Y N Chow, SBS, JP Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food.
The following parade will be proceeding on coming Sunday afternoon.
If you have time and want to express you anger on this matter, please come and air your views.
"我們是一班分別在０１及０２年入讀暨南大學與香港專業進修學院合辦，六年兼讀制中醫專業本科學士學位課程的香港永久居民。
六年的時間及每人付出十多萬元學費，為的是苦讀苦學，成為中醫專業專才，並以我們所識所長，服務社會大眾。
然 而，中醫藥管理委員會(下簡稱:中委會)的《中醫藥條例》在2003年將參加中醫執業資格試的資格由“完成中醫本科學士學位課程”修訂為“完成五年全日制 中醫本科學士學位課程”，此修訂，令到大約數百名一直在在學，並等待在完成中醫本科學士學位課程後，參加中醫執業資格試的香港永久居民造成嚴重影響，令我 們喪失原先享有的權利───就是在完成為期六年的中醫本科學士學位課程後，參加中醫執業資格試的權利。
當局在數年間，屢次修改有關條例，但就完全沒有給予這些在條例生效前已正在修讀（非五年全日制）中醫本科學士學位課程課程的學生任何咨詢，更加不設寬限期。
多年來，中委會不但屢次在沒進一步咨詢的情況下黑箱作業，肆意修改法律；對有我們的學校及同學的查詢只予以官僚式的答覆，並沒有顧及那些最受立法修訂影響的人士的應有合法權利。
六年來，我們的忍耐，己經到逹飽和；我們的憤怒，己經在沸騰。
身為香港的一分子，我們的合法權利，豈容踐踏？？？
這是一個講求公平公正，合法合理，和諧社會所不能容忍！！！
今日我們要為自己應有的權利，站出來高呼：
還我──“參加中醫執業資格試”的權利
Remove / Fire the guys who say Examination can not assess qualifications
To : Mr York Y N Chow, SBS, JP Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Ms Sandra Lee, JP Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Dear Sirs,
Re : The Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong, the Council
Please remove / fire the guys who advocate that Examination by itself can not assess qualifications.
The offshore relevant qualifications including professional and / or academic, of which are recognised at the country(ies) where the qualifications, practising license and academic degrees no matter what kind of learning modes, are issued by the Professional body(ies), like the PRC Ministry of Health and the PRC Universities respectively, must be considered for practising as a Chinese Medicine Practitioner in Hong Kong by The Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong. Bearing in mind that the PRC Universities are the ones that are already recognised and being listed in the website of Education Bureau.
In case The Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong were not sure of the applicants' qualification(s), then, the written and practising Examinations must come into play for the further assessments.
Please be reminded and informed that the content, the format and all other things of the Examinations are set soley by The Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong.
If there are still personnels and committee/ Council members of The Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong who advocate that Examination by itself can not assess qualifications. Please have them removed and fired. Otherwise, I would like our Government to consider to dissolve the Hong Kong Examination Authority.
Thank you.
Ms Sandra Lee, JP Permanent Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food
Chairman and Council Members of Chinese Medicine Council Hong Kong
Chief Secretary for Administration of HKSAR
Chief Executive of HKSAR
Dear Sirs,
Re : The Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong, the Council
Please remove / fire the guys who advocate that Examination by itself can not assess qualifications.
The offshore relevant qualifications including professional and / or academic, of which are recognised at the country(ies) where the qualifications, practising license and academic degrees no matter what kind of learning modes, are issued by the Professional body(ies), like the PRC Ministry of Health and the PRC Universities respectively, must be considered for practising as a Chinese Medicine Practitioner in Hong Kong by The Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong. Bearing in mind that the PRC Universities are the ones that are already recognised and being listed in the website of Education Bureau.
In case The Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong were not sure of the applicants' qualification(s), then, the written and practising Examinations must come into play for the further assessments.
Please be reminded and informed that the content, the format and all other things of the Examinations are set soley by The Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong.
If there are still personnels and committee/ Council members of The Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong who advocate that Examination by itself can not assess qualifications. Please have them removed and fired. Otherwise, I would like our Government to consider to dissolve the Hong Kong Examination Authority.
Thank you.
Request for rectification of the unfair policy implemented by Chinese Medicine Council HK
Dear Mr Donald Tsang, Chief Executive of HKSAR
There exists the skewed and unfair rules in registering the Chinese Medicine Practitioners in Hong Kong and you are always advocating the opposite view during your debates and compaign for the coming term of Chief Executive of HKSAR. The Chinese Medicine Council HK is just running against what you propose.
Being a leader of Hong Kong, who should stand up and rectify the skewness and unfairness practising by Chinese Medicine Council HK.
Am I right? Does the above match your concept of Administration of HKSAR?
Your Bold Move in rectification of the unfairness of Chinese Medicine Council HK is highly expecting.
Thank you.Registration of Chinese Medicine Practitioners (2)
Dear Ms. Pamela LAM, Principal Assistant Secretary (Health) 1
Health, Welfare and Food Bureau
I have tried to contact you for several times for meeting last week for discussing with you for the captioned subject in person but all are in vain.
1. Concerning the issue of protection of the public's health:
May I reiterate that my wife has a Nation-wide Practising License which allows her to practise where-ever in China giving direct consultation to a maximum of 1.3 billion patients while your registered practitioners may only have a maximum of 7 million patients in Hong Kong.
Then what is your reasonale behind for advocating that the protection of the public£ªs health is one of the reasons that prevents my wife from practising here in Hong Kong?
Are the people in China not the same people in humand kind and not in your definition of people in Hong Kong?
Are the lives of the people in China so unimportant than that of those in Hong Kong?
Does the Ministry of Health in China issue practising licenses to unqualifiy persons, without assessing their academic and professional knowledge and experience?
2. Academic Degree
My wife started the chinese medicine career by studying full time 3-year of Nurse Course in Sep 1988 - Jun 1991 and proceeding to part-time Specialist Course in Aug 1995 - Apr1999 and finally to the part-time Degree course in Apr. 1999-Jun 2003, making it up of a total of 3-year full time and 8-year of part-time to get the degree.
Thereafter, my wife has got a chinese medicine degree through the PRC nation-wide unified examination from Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the academic of qualfication of which is both recognised by our government and Chinese Medicine Council HK, CMCHK.
In satisfying the graduation requirements of getting the chinese medicine degree, my wife had taken the a total of twenty two courses / subjects, which are two folds more than that required by CMCHK. Furthermore, my wife also was sent to a hospital for apprentice practising for sixteen months that was also double in time span than the CMCHK's requirement under its Candidate Handbook
3. CEPA
They are you and the Chinese Medicine Council HK who are not willing to implement the mutual recognition of professional qualification for the industry of Chinese Medicine. We, the outsiders, do not know why.
Please be informed that Hong Kong is an Open Society where there is no fear of Competition which ultimately results the marginal advantage(s) to Hong Kong Citizens.
To make it a success, it is simply to include the practising qualification in the Chinese Medicine Ordinance as one of the conditions in the entrance of the industry of Chinese Medicine, isn't it ?
That does not affect the skewed policy of Chinese Medicine Council HK.
4. Legislations
Please be informed that the official qualification of the degree my wife has obtained, at the back of which, (reverse side) has clear words stipulating that the part-time degrees after graduating from the Whole Nation-wide Unified Examination, have the same status, in terms of job nature and remuneration as that of the full-time graduates which is endorced by the Acts made by Whole Nation Representatives of People Republic of China and the Higher Education Act of PRC.
In addtion, more than ten independent Legislative Councillors with whom
we do not have any relationship, also present their written opinions
after understanding my wife's academic and professional background in the
area of Chinese Medicine, to theChinese Medicine Council HK that my wife should be given a
chance to siiting for the Practitioners Examination in 2006 during the final appeal on 20th April 2006.
If, by now, I may rally more than thirty independent Legislative Councillors in favour of the above, what would you say? Still indifferent as before?
If you were to respect the legistations both in Hong Kong and China, then why do you still saying that do not have plans to amend the Ordinance.
For a professional body to assess the academic qualification for a candidate for registration purposes, she ususally asks if the academic degree is recognised in the related profession in the country the qualification obtained. if it is affirmative, then it is recognised as the equivalent standard. This practice is universally carried out when assessing the applicants who registrate as a member of a professional body.
Problem(s) is/are existing here in the skewed policy of Chinese Medicine Council HK. You being an Policy Bureau, is responsible for rectifying skewed position of the entrance of the industry of Chinese Medicine.
Please do so immediately.
高永文成為首批免考試在內地行醫的醫生
Dear Ms. Pamela LAM, Principal Assistant Secretary (Health) 1
Health, Welfare and Food Bureau
Quote from Ming Pao Daily News on Jun 12th, 2007
"...骨科醫生高永文2005 年底， 在CEPA 下成為首批免考試在內地行醫的醫生，每逢周日到番禺祈福醫院的港醫門診部應診。..."
Please open the industry of Chinese Medicine in Hong Kong.
回歸十周年 CEPA5 送大禮 港醫生赴內地 將可獨資開診
Dear Ms. Pamela LAM, Principal Assistant Secretary (Health) 1
Health, Welfare and Food Bureau
Quote from Wen Wei Po on Jun 11th, 2007 "...在今次CEPA5新措施推出之前，本港醫生其實是獲准可享首3年免試執業資格，與內地人合作經營醫療診所，在3年後才需補考相關考試..."
Why is the industry of Chinese medicine of Hong Kong still self-contained herself ?
Does it equitable and reasonable?
Camson Tang
"Wen Wei Po Jun 11, 07
回歸十周年 CEPA5 送大禮 港醫生赴內地 將可獨資開診
回歸十周年 CEPA5 送大禮 港醫生赴內地 將可獨資開診
本報獨家報道
【本報北京新聞中心記者鍾雪冰、劉凝哲10日電】香港回歸十周年紀念之際，中央政府再推出連串重大挺港措施。據此間權威人士透露，備受港人期盼的 「CEPA5」 (《〈內地與香港關於建立更緊密經貿關係的安排〉補充協議之四》)將在近期簽訂。在這個協議中，據了解，中央有可能在兩地醫療、衛生交流上推出多項「重磅 政策」，包括通過內 地醫師資格考試的本港醫生，即可在內地獨資開辦私人診所或聯合診所。目前，取得內地醫師資格的港人已有60多名。CEPA5中針對香港醫療界人士出台利好 政策，不僅將大大拓展本港醫生的從業空間，亦將促進內地醫療體制改革進一步發展。
權威人士透露，CEPA5中料將規定，內地允許開設 港資獨資診所，這是中國首次允許外資獨資開設醫療機構。業內人士指出，中國在入世之後，並未允許外資獨資經營醫療機構，不僅可與中方合資經營，中資控股還 不低於30％。台灣產業鉅子王永慶曾計劃投資150億元，分別在內地三大城市開設醫院，但政府並未批准其獨資經營醫院。多家海外大型醫藥集團亦看準中國巨 大市場，希望以獨資形式進軍內地，均未獲得政府批准。
希望提供高水平服務
隨著CEPA5的公佈，港資成為首個獲准 成立獨資私人診所的外資。權威人士透露，CEPA5將對港資獨資診所的投資者進行詳細規定，包括香港特區永久居民、獲得香港醫師資格證書並且執業五年以 上、通過內地醫師資格考試等等。符合條件者即可在內地開設港資私人診所、聯合診所、合資診所等。
權威人士透露，中央希望港資診所能夠繼續保持目前的高端服務狀態，並能夠服務於內地社區衛生體系。他指出，港資診所經營、收費等均可自行設立，政府不會進行任何干涉。
到西部行醫可獲優惠
「允許開辦香港獨資診所，是很大的突破」，該人士強調，中央希望進一步對港開放內地醫療市場，並且為特區醫療工作者謀得真正實惠。他表示，制定政策前，中 央不但詳細了解過香港醫生的需求和願望，衛生部與香港衛生福利局還曾就此事進行過多次溝通，以確定政策的完整性與可行性。
權威人士強調，港資私人診所並不局限在個別省市，香港醫生可在全國開設診所，但中央更加歡迎在西部地區投資。若在西部開設私人診所，政府還將有更多優惠措施，在投資金額、稅收、土地等方面均有優惠。
據有關部門統計，截止到2006年，中央共批准建立百餘家合資醫療機構，其中港資合資機構約為三十餘家，佔整個合資醫療機構的三成以上。另悉，自2003年CEPA允許港澳人士參加內地醫師資格考試以來，已有100多名港人參加考試，取得內地醫師資格的港人60多名。"
促浸大解釋論文醜聞
Dear Ms. Pamela LAM
Principal Assistant Secretary (Health)
Professor Liu Liang is the Dean of School of Chinese Medicine - Baptist University which is the founder of Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong in 1999. The President of Baptist University and Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong at that time is Professor Daniel Tse Chi Wai who is a Macau citizen and had left Hong Kong for Macau.
They (Professor Liu Liang, Professor Daniel Tse Chi Wai and Baptist University) all advocate the importance of full-time study for the entry of the Industry of Chinese Medicine in Hong kong.
May the repeated scandals from the Dean of School of Chinese Medicine - Baptist University, Professor Liu Liang contribute to the quality of full-time teaching that you consider the utmost importance for the entry of the Industry of Chinese Medicine ?
Chinese has an old saying " Don't ask the heroes where they come from".
Being an management official in a Policy Bureau, you are advised to practise the philosophy of "Substance Over Form".
Thank you.
camson tang
| 蘋果日報 Jul 6, 07 - 5:35 PM | 期刊促浸大解釋論文醜聞 2007-06-27期刊促浸大解釋論文醜聞 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 【本報訊】浸會大學中醫藥學院三篇論文自我剽竊的醜聞擴大，再有刊登論文的學術期刊要求該學院解釋。 違反出版法則 該 學院昨舉行「中醫藥節」，有參與該三份論文的院長劉良被記者問及事件時，裝作視而不見，將記者推開；浸大校長吳清輝也拒回應，只說：「學校做嘢有板有眼， 適當時候會做適當嘅嘢。」荷蘭學術期刊《Journal of Ethnopharmacology》總編輯去信在論文作者一欄中排首位的浸大中醫藥學院教授，指該學院將一個實驗結果寫成三份論文，刊登在不同期刊，令 讀者產生混亂，降低可信性，「違反數個出版法則，（資料）不只沒有得到（其他論文）出版社准許，並有自我剽竊，闡述研究也出現嚴重錯誤。」一份日本期刊早 前罕有地撤回劉良有份參與的另一論文。 |
Registration of Chinese Medicine Practitioners
Dear Ms. Pamela LAM
Principal Assistant Secretary (Health)
Thank you for your email.
I totally agree with what you say about upholding the professional standard which has been clearly communicated with your colleaques before through telephone dialogues.
What I am really asking for :
Why should our Government not select the well-experienced and qualified and practising Chinese Medicine Professionals but merely uniquely considering for full-time degree holders who are fresh in terms of experience of direct consultation into the Industry of Chinese Medicine?
Your policy is skewed and is not good and healthy for the development of the Industry of Chinese Medicine in Hong Kong.
Hong Kong is an Open Society where there is no fear of Competition which ultimately results the marginal advantage(s) to Hong Kong Citizens.
Please let the PRC Licensed CMPs practising here.
I take the development of a professional body, Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants, HKICPA, as an example to illustrate my point above.
Since 1975 the growth of accounting industry by HKICPA in Hong Kong has been developing. Form 1975 to 2005, these 30 years, in order to build the accounting profession in Hong Kong, HKICPA admits the following professional accounting qualification UNILATERALLY:
Association of International Accountants (AIA)
Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA)
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA)
The Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants (CICPA)
Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA)
Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA)
CPA Australia (CPAA)
Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia (ICAA)
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW)
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ireland (ICAI)
New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants (NZICA)
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS)
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Zimbabwe (ICAZ)
South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA)
In doing so, qualified professionals are attracted to Hong Kong to help build the industry and up to the year of 2005/06. By now, HKICPA has about 30,000 members while compared to a few thousands of CMPs in Hong Kong.
Through this scheme, Hong Kong becomes one of financial centres in the world which may directly attribute for the sufficient availability of quaified acccounting professionals in Hong Kong.
Then, why not adopt the simlair approach as that of HKICPA if our Government wants to prosper the Industry of Chinese Medicine?
Going back the Medical Industry,
1. 高永文成為首批免考試在內地行醫的醫生 in 2005
2. CEPA5規定，內地允許開設港資獨資診所
Then why cannot our Government have the equivalent polic(ies) as that of Mainland China?
Please rectify the skewed policy immediately.
Thank you.
camson tang
From: "Pamela NM LAM"
To: camson1@hotmail.com
Subject: Registration of Chinese Medicine Practitioners
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:24:51 +0800
>
>Dear Mr Tang,
>
>I refer to your previous communications with the Private Office of the
>Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food, the Permanent Secretary for Health
>and Welfare and me.
>
>The Chinese Medicine Ordinance was enacted in 1999 after extensive
>consultation and deliberation. Under the prevailing principle of
>professional self-regulation, the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong and
>the Chinese Medicine Practitioners Board were set up as independent
>statutory bodies and tasked to benchmark and maintain the standards of the
>Chinese medicine profession through examination, registration, disciplinary
>mechanism and continuing medical education. This regulatory system,
>similar to that for other healthcare professions such as doctors and
>dentists, aims to ensure the professional standard of Chinese Medicine
>Practitioners and protect the health and well-being of patients. Over the
>years the regulatory system has been implemented in phases and it has
>gradually gained the recognition of the public.
>
>To be eligible to undertake the Chinese Medicine Practitioners Licensing
>Examination, a person must have satisfactorily completed an undergraduate
>degree course in Chinese Medicine practice or an equivalent programme as
>approved by the Practitioners Board. The practice of CMPs is closely
>related to the health of the public. Therefore, the Practitioners Board
>considers that for students to complete satisfactorily an undergraduate
>degree course in Chinese medicine, they should have received comprehensive
>and fundamental university education as well as undergone full-time
>learning. Students should also be provided with adequate opportunity to
>practise continually in order to complete all the relevant clinical
>training and experiments. A full-time on campus learning environment is an
>important component of quality teaching. To maintain the professional
>standard and status of Chinese Medicine Practitioners, and with regard to
>the corresponding licensing requirements for other healthcare professions
>(e.g. medical practitioners and dentists), the Practitioners Board
>considers that the full-time mode of education should be adopted for the
>recognised courses for the Licensing Examination. The Practitioners Board
>at present recognizes the five-year full-time undergraduate degree courses
>in Chinese medicine offered by 31 Chinese medicine institutes and
>universities. Those courses have been assessed by the Committee on
>Assessment of Chinese Medicine Degree Courses or are recommended by the
>state authority entrusted by the Practitioners Board.
>
>CEPA and its supplements encourage the relevant competent authorities and
>professional bodes to consider mutual recognition of professional
>qualifications and exchange of professional talents between the Mainland
>and Hong Kong SAR.
>
>We fully appreciate that adequate manpower supply is vital to the
>development of Hong Kong’s healthcare system. The Government closely
>monitors the supply of and demand for healthcare professionals and would
>update our manpower planning from time to time. As for the training of
>Mainland nurses cited in your email, you may wish to note that under the
>plan, some Mainland students would be provided with training in public
>hospitals and they would return to the Mainland upon completion of the
>programme.
>
>We trust that the above and our previous replies should have clearly
>explained our position and we do not see the need for a meeting.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>Pamela LAM
>Principal Assistant Secretary (Health)
Pamela - totally disappointed
Dear Ms. Pamela LAM, Principal Assistant Secretary (Health) 1
Health, Welfare and Food Bureau
Having received no written confirmation / repy from you, leading me to believe that you being one of highest ranking officials in Health, Welfare and Food Bureau, are telling me that you are not helping-citizens oriented by acting so much bureaucratic, I am totally disappointed and puzzled why such attitude / way of practising is still existing in our government which just runs against the slogan of our Chief Executive, Mr Donald Tsang during his election campaign for Chief Executive that "Every Citizen will be treated fairly and have the voice heard".
I consider that slogan of our Chief Executive is just only a fake promise !
Camson Tang
Dear Ms. Pamela LAM, Principal Assistant Secretary (Health) 1
Health, Welfare and Food Bureau
May I ask whether the following standard reply from CMCHK is your substantive reply for which you inform me to wait on May 21, 2007 ?
Your immediate comment is highly expecting.
camson tang
| |
|
Copy to : 港澳办
Dear Ms. Pamela LAM, Principal Assistant Secretary (Health) 1
Health, Welfare and Food Bureau
Thank you for your email.
I have tried to contact you for several times for meeting last week for discussing with you for the captioned subject in person but all are in vain.
1. Concerning the issue of protection of the public＊s health:
May I reiterate that my wife has a Nation-wide Practising License which allows her to practise where-ever in China giving direct consultation to a maximum of 1.3 billion patients while your registered practitioners may only have a maximum of 7 million patients in Hong Kong.
Then what is your reasonale behind for advocating that the protection of the public＊s health is one of the reasons that prevents my wife from practising here in Hong Kong?
Are the people in China not the same people in humand kind and not in your definition of people in Hong Kong?
Are the lives of the people in China so unimportant than that of those in Hong Kong?
Does the Ministry of Health in China issue practising licenses to unqualifiy persons, without assessing their academic and professional knowledge and experience?
2. Academic Degree
My wife started the chinese medicine career by studying full time 3-year of Nurse Course in Sep 1988 每 Jun 1991 and proceeding to part-time Specialist Course in Aug 1995 每Apr1999 and finally to the part-time Degree course in Apr. 1999-Jun 2003, making it up of a total of 3-year full time and 8-year of part-time to get the degree.
Thereafter, my wife has got a chinese medicine degree through the PRC nation-wide unified examination from Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the academic of qualfication of which is both recognised by our government and Chinese Medicine Council HK, CMCHK.
In satisfying the graduation requirements of getting the chinese medicine degree, my wife had taken the a total of twenty two courses / subjects, which are two folds more than that required by CMCHK. Furthermore, my wife also was sent to a hospital for apprentice practising for sixteen months that was also double in time span than the CMCHK's requirement under its Candidate Handbook
3. CEPA
They are you and the Chinese Medicine Council HK who are not willing to implement the mutual recognition of professional qualification for the industry of Chinese Medicine. We, the outsiders, do not know why.
Please be informed that Hong Kong is an Open Society where there is no fear of Competition which ultimately results the marginal advantage(s) to Hong Kong Citizens.
To make it a success, it is simply to include the practising qualification in the Chinese Medicine Ordinance as one of the conditions in the entrance of the industry of Chinese Medicine, isn't it ?
That does not affect the skewed policy of Chinese Medicine Council HK.
4. Legislations
Please be informed that the official qualification of the degree my wife has obtained, at the back of which, (reverse side) has clear words stipulating that the part-time degrees after graduating from the Whole Nation-wide Unified Examination, have the same status, in terms of job nature and remuneration as that of the full-time graduates which is endorced by the Acts made by Whole Nation Representatives of People Republic of China and the Higher Education Act of PRC.
In addtion, more than ten independent Legislative Councillors with whom
we do not have any relationship, also present their written opinions
after understanding my wife's academic and professional background in the
area of Chinese Medicine, to theChinese Medicine Council HK that my wife should be given a
chance to siiting for the Practitioners Examination in 2006 during the final appeal on 20th April 2006.
If, by now, I may rally more than thirty independent Legislative Councillors in favour of the above, what would you say? Still indifferent as before?
If you were to respect the legistations both in Hong Kong and China, then why do you still saying that do not have plans to amend the Ordinance.
For a professional body to assess the academic qualification for a candidate for registration purposes, she ususally asks if the academic degree is recognised in the related profession in the country the qualification obtained. if it is affirmative, then it is recognised as the equivalent standard. This practice is universally carried out when assessing the applicants who registrate as a member of a professional body.
Problem(s) is/are existing here in the skewed policy of Chinese Medicine Council HK. You being an Policy Bureau, is responsible for rectifying skewed position of the entrance of the industry of Chinese Medicine.
Please do so immediately.
camson tang
From: "Pamela NM LAM"
To: camson1@hotmail.com
Subject: Registration of Chinese Medicine Practitioners
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 18:23:23 +0800
>
>Dear Mr Tang,
>
>Thank you for your recent e-mails to the Chief Executive and the Permanent
>Secretary for Health and Welfare. Your enquiries have been referred to me
>for reply.
>
>To protect the public＊s health and ensure that they could enjoy quality
>healthcare services, it is of utmost importance to maintain the
>professional standard of our healthcare practitioners. Under the
>prevailing principle of professional self-regulation, the Chinese Medicine
>Council of Hong Kong was set up as an independent statutory body and tasked
>to benchmark and maintain the standards of the Chinese medicine profession
>through examination, registration, disciplinary mechanism and continuing
>medical education.
>
>To be eligible to undertake the Chinese Medicine Practitioners Licensing
>Examination, a person must have satisfactorily completed an undergraduate
>degree course in Chinese medicine practice or an equivalent programme as
>approved by the Chinese Medicine Practitioners Board. The Practitioners
>Board considers that the full-time mode of education should be adopted for
>the recognised courses for the Licensing Examination. One of the reasons
>is that a full-time on-campus learning environment is an important
>component of quality teaching. This is also in line with the corresponding
>licensing requirements for other healthcare professions, e.g. medical
>practitioners and dentists.
>
>CEPA and its supplements do not require Hong Kong to allow Chinese medicine
>practitioners from the Mainland to practise in Hong Kong. That said, under
>CEPA the Mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region should
>encourage mutual recognition of professional qualifications and promote the
>exchange of professional talents. Specific arrangements for mutual
>recognition of professional qualifications are to be considered by the
>competent authorities and professional bodies. As mentioned above, the
>Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong is the relevant professional
>authority and as such you may wish to raise your view with the Council.
>
>The registration system for Chinese medicine practitioners as provided for
>in the Chinese Medicine Ordinance has been working well, and was set up
>after broad public consultation and careful scrutiny by the Legislative
>Council. While we do not have plans to amend the Ordinance, we will
>continue to listen to the views of the community.
>
>The above explains our position on the registration of Chinese medicine
>practitioners. I hope you would find this of use.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>
>Pamela LAM
>Principal Assistant Secretary (Health) 1
>Health, Welfare and Food Bureau
There are qualified medical professionals already here in Hong Kong
Dear Pamela, I refer to bottom paragraph of your following reply email sent to me on 29 Jun 2007 "We fully appreciate that adequate manpower supply is vital to the development of Hong Kong’s healthcare system. The Government closely monitors the supply of and demand for healthcare professionals and would update our manpower planning from time to time" The extent of manpower shortage has reached to a level where present practitioners cannot handle as illustrated by the RTHK's news report which is reproduced by your kind reference immediately below my this request. There are qualified medical professionals already here in Hong Kong. They may be of help to ease the manpower shortage problem(s). Why don't use them? This may be one of the prompt and immediate solutions. Thanks.
多 個 醫 護 人 員 團 體 指 醫 管 局 醫 護 人 手 短 缺 問 題 嚴 重 | |
| 2007-07-09 HKT 09:53 | |
|
浸大博士論文 被指捏造數據
Dear Pamela, Principal Assistant Secretary (Health)
The quality of Traniner, Liu Liang, the Dean of Chinese Medicine of Baptist University, which you emphasseses is very important for full time graduates (studying).
The now and then scandals disclose that if one has granxi (relationship) / background with a person in power, the one may easily get the qualification. 劉中秋 (劉良院長的胞弟) is a very good example to illustrate this fact, which exactly reflects that the PRC qualification is not universally unofficially recognised in Hong Kong.
But this scenario should not be universally applied for those who are just ordinary citizens with no granxi (relationship) / background and get their PRC qualification by their own studying.
Another phenomenon that you may not hear of is that good public examination results of a plain candidate were stolen by persons who have granxi (relationship) / background.
Actually, it is very difficult for a plain candidate to get a PRC Professional / Academic qualification in China.
I hope the above may help you refine the policies in scrutinizing the Industry of Chinese Medicine in Hong Kong.
Thus, please open the Industry of Chinese Medicine. Please let the competition function.
Thank you.
The quality of Traniner, Liu Liang, the Dean of Chinese Medicine of Baptist University, which you emphasseses is very important for full time graduates (studying).
The now and then scandals disclose that if one has granxi (relationship) / background with a person in power, the one may easily get the qualification. 劉中秋 (劉良院長的胞弟) is a very good example to illustrate this fact, which exactly reflects that the PRC qualification is not universally unofficially recognised in Hong Kong.
But this scenario should not be universally applied for those who are just ordinary citizens with no granxi (relationship) / background and get their PRC qualification by their own studying.
Another phenomenon that you may not hear of is that good public examination results of a plain candidate were stolen by persons who have granxi (relationship) / background.
Actually, it is very difficult for a plain candidate to get a PRC Professional / Academic qualification in China.
I hope the above may help you refine the policies in scrutinizing the Industry of Chinese Medicine in Hong Kong.
Thus, please open the Industry of Chinese Medicine. Please let the competition function.
Thank you.
camson tang
| 明報 Aug 10, 07 - 11:14 PM | 浸大博士論文 被指捏造數據 浸大博士論文 被指捏造數據 (明報) 08月 06日 星期一 05:05AM 【明報專訊】浸會大學繼中醫藥學院院長劉良等學者被指學術論文涉嫌剽竊之後，再有一名前博士後研究員被質疑其博士論文的數據捏造，因兩次以不同方法和樣本數目完成的實驗，數據不尋常地相似。 浸大發言人表示，會詳細了解事件，校方向來嚴謹地評審各學術程度的功課和論文。 一 名浸大畢業生向本報投訴，指浸大中醫藥學院前博士後研究員劉中秋 (劉良院長的胞弟)，在浸大取得博士學位的論文，內裏的實驗數據與另一份他自己和劉良有份參與的論文十分相似。該二人有參與的論文，早前在一份日本 學術期刊發表，後因懷疑剽竊，因兩個不同實驗的數據高度相似，論文最終被撤回。 |
醫 生 教 育 不 足- 打 錯 針 害 一 命. The Doctor comes from your advocated FULL-TIME STUDY
Dear Pamela,
One more evidence supports that full-time learning may not be better than part-time learning.
The CRUX is to focus on the actual knowledge and practising experience otained from the pracitising medical pracititioners who excersie their professional expertise in healing the sicked rather on the mode of learning, isn't it?
Thus, please revise the entry requirement of the Industry of Chinese Medicine by deleting the unique requirement of full time learning.
your immediate rectifying action is highly appreciated.
Thank you.
camson tang
打 錯 針 害 一 命 調 查 委 會 坦 言
小 琳 枉 死 醫 生 教 育 不 足
【 本 報 訊 】 醫 院 管 理 局 昨 日 公 佈 患 血 癌 的 21 歲 女 子 呂 巧 琳 被 威 爾 斯 親 王 醫 院 打 錯 針 致 死 的 事 件 報 告 。 報 告 指 出 ， 當 日 為 小 琳 打 針 的 女 醫 生 及 護 士 ， 沒 有 按 程 序 覆 核 藥 物 的 注 射 方 法 ， 將 只 作 靜 脈 注 射 的 長 春 新 鹼 打 入 小 琳 脊 髓 ， 令 她 死 亡 。 調 查 委 員 會 坦 言 ， 事 件 涉 及 醫 生 
育 不 足 問 題 ， 尚 有 其 他 醫 生 不 知 將 長 春 新 鹼 注 入 脊 髓 內 會 死 亡 ， 需 要 加 強 培 訓 。 記 者 ： 陳 沛 冰 、 白 琳
Australian Doctor comes from your advocated FULL-TIME STUDY- 西 醫 亂 診 症
Dear Pamela, The Assistant Secretary of Food and Health Bureau
Another evidence coming from 本 港 註 冊 西 醫 Chu George Joseph, further supports that full-time learning may not be better than part-time learning.
The CRUX is to focus on the actual knowledge and practising experience otained from the pracitising medical pracititioners who excersie their professional expertise in healing the sicked rather on the mode of learning, isn't it?
Thus, please revise the entry requirement of the Industry of Chinese Medicine by deleting the unique requirement of full time learning.
Your immediate rectifying action is highly appreciated.
Thank you.
camson tang
本 報 訊 】 本 港 註 冊 西 醫 Chu George Joseph 於 2000 年 在 澳 洲 執 業 期 間 ， 為 一 名 體 重 急 降 的 女 病 人 診 治 時 ， 竟 未 有 發 覺 她 病 重 ， 早 前 被 新 南 威 爾 斯 醫 療 部 門 裁 定 專 業 失 當 罪 成 。 澳 洲 其 後 把 Joseph 罪 行 通 知 香 港 醫 務 委 員 會 ， 醫 委 會 昨 以 相 同 罪 名 控 告 他 。 他 昨 被 判 停 牌 3 個 月 ， 但 緩 刑 1 年 。
不 知 病 人 腸 爆 裂 周 身 瘡
案 情 透 露 ， Joseph 分 別 在 2000 年 11 月 7 日 及 14 日 ， 為 一 名 過 去 一 年 體 重 急 降 了 63.5 公 斤 的 女 病 人 診 症 時 ， 沒 有 發 現 她 病 情 嚴 重 ， 女 病 人 其 後 因 身 體 不 適 到 醫 院 檢 查 ， 才 發 現 部 份 腸 臟 爆 裂 ， 身 體 長 滿 膿 瘡 。 新 南 威 爾 斯 醫 療 部 門 認 為 ， Joseph 沒 有 為 病 人 作 詳 細 檢 查 及 正 確 的 血 液 病 理 檢 查 ， 令 病 人 病 情 惡 化 ， 被 裁 定 專 業 失 當 罪 成 。
澳 洲 當 局 其 後 把 Joseph 所 犯 的 失 當 行 為 通 知 香 港 醫 委 會 ， 醫 委 會 認 為 事 態 嚴 重 並 展 開 聆 訊 。 該 會 主 席 麥 列 菲 菲 表 示 ， 本 港 與 多 個 國 家 及 地 區 的 醫 療 部 門 設 有 通 報 機 制 ， 若 某 地 醫 生 在 另 一 地 區 犯 了 刑 事 或 涉 及 專 業 失 當 行 為 ， 兩 地 醫 療 部 門 會 互 通 消 息 ， 該 醫 生 在 專 業 註 冊 地 區 的 醫 療 部 門 ， 有 權 向 其 提 出 聆 訊 ， 決 定 他 是 否 適 宜 行 醫 。 鑑 於 Joseph 承 認 控 罪 ， 加 上 他 長 期 於 澳 洲 協 助 傷 殘 病 人 ， 故 判 他 停 牌 三 個 月 ， 緩 刑 一 年 這 較 輕 的 懲 罰 。
Joseph 聞 判 決 後 表 現 輕 鬆 ， 指 自 己 多 年 前 在 菲 律 賓 畢 業 ， 但 未 曾 在 港 執 業 ， 稍 後 會 返 澳 洲 繼 續 行 醫 。
Please practise "SUBSTANCE OVER FORM"
Dear Pamela, The Assistant Secretary of Food and Health Bureau
The Hospital Authority is further criticized as 「汰強留弱」.
Please practise "SUBSTANCE OVER FORM" and not to stand firm on the mode of learning. Let's 「汰弱留強」. There are well-experienced medical professionals who are already in Hong Kong. Why not let them help?
Thanks.
| 太陽報 Aug 26, 07 - 2:51 PM | 市民斥醫管局「汰強留弱」 「公院醫生水皮無愛心」 連串 駭人醫療事故後，一名患有輸尿管結石的麥姓病人昨日再踢爆威爾斯親王醫院只顧病床緊張，不顧病人身體狀況，急趕他出院。其後十個月，他六次因為病發向急症 室求診，其中竟有五次被拒，最終累他暈倒街頭，惟有到私家醫院做手術。麥先生痛斥公立醫院醫生水皮、對病人漠不關心。醫管局質素及安全總監梁聣賢昨日承 認，服務未達市民期望，需要善用資源去改進。 打錯針導致美少女死亡後，昨日不少市民在電台節目狂轟打錯針報告將責任推卸給前線醫生，痛斥 醫管局虧待醫生。麥先生亦致電投訴，他去年因輸尿管結石入住發生打錯化療針的威爾斯親王醫院，每天醫生巡房為他檢查不足三分鐘，一周後便叫他出院，再沒有 跟進。往後十個月，他六次發病，痛得又暈又嘔，但六次到急症室求診，五次被拒，更被醫生訓斥：「急症室還急症室，泌尿科還泌尿科。」 聽眾轟醫局卸責前線 麥 指出，泌尿科排期做手術需三、四年，即使病情緊急，他亦惟有一忍再忍。兩個月後，他再入急症室，醫生終肯寫信安排緊急排期做手術，但要再等三個月，豈料翌 日麥先生已痛得暈倒街頭，最終到私家醫院做手術。他痛斥：「公立醫院好有問題，醫生本身唔夠，好質素醫生又走晒，留低的無愛心、水皮、對病人漠不關心，可 能醫管局唔關心醫生，醫生惡性循環，唔關心病人。」 聽眾阮女士亦批評，過去十年醫護質素下降，她母親曾在公立醫院抽血，「抽到手腫都抽唔到」，又質疑醫療事故「唔應該等有事先檢討」！萬先生認為，打錯針報告歸咎前線醫生工作繁忙，把醫管局的責任推卸得一乾二淨。 梁 聣賢昨日坦承，威院打錯針事件，是醫管局的錯，不能迴避責任，院方正與家屬商討賠償，認為家屬追究責任是合理反應。他又稱，正考慮邀請外國專家，研究各專 科的用藥風險，及由專人監察世界各地的醫療失誤，向本地醫護人員通報，及在未來兩、三年，繼續探討邀請外國認證機構，評核醫管局服務質素的可行性。 |
中醫註冊制在香港已經實行四年多了... (2007)
Dear Pamela, The Assistant Secretary of Food and Health Bureau
Originally I may be biased due to my subjective deduction that the Government of Hong Kong really does not want to prosper the Industry of Chinese Medicine in Hong Kong. By now, my guess seems to be correct as there is/are prastising CMP(s) out there echoing my view.
No matter how, what I have recommended, suggested, discussed with you since the January 2005, all are treated indifferently. The truth of your stance seems coming out.
How dare you keep on declaring that your present registration system is for the good of general public. Hyprocrites!.
camson tang
都市日報 一位註冊中醫師, Aug 27, 07
...可惜，中醫註冊制在香港已經實行四年多了，中醫卻逐步失去發展機遇，人才也在快速流失。如果相關政府部門繼續漠 不關心，沒有任何可行方案來推動中醫的發展，聽任西醫越俎代庖、草率規劃中醫發展藍圖，情況可能更糟。至今在中醫臨床科研方面，包括幾所大學，沒有一個中 醫的臨床科研基地。現在各醫院逐步開辦的十八間中醫門診，不過是醫管局回應民意和慳錢的外判服務，並無做科研的條件和能力，就是高水準的中醫診治服務都算 不上。這就是香港中醫的現狀，難道是醫管局只願意給香港市民提供二三流的中醫服務嗎？
醫管局掌握了政府大部分的醫療資源，能否從社會醫療衛生的需求作主要考慮？如能真正發揮中醫的優勢，既可減輕財政壓力，又可為市民提供更多元化的醫療服務，相信是社會各界樂於見到。且看醫管局如何領導香港中醫走向未來。
醫管局掌握了政府大部分的醫療資源，能否從社會醫療衛生的需求作主要考慮？如能真正發揮中醫的優勢，既可減輕財政壓力，又可為市民提供更多元化的醫療服務，相信是社會各界樂於見到。且看醫管局如何領導香港中醫走向未來。
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)